Judgment No. 22294 of 2024: Marital Violence and Separation Blame

Judgment No. 22294 of August 7, 2024, by the Court of Cassation represents an important confirmation of the rights of spouses who are victims of violence within marriage. In this case, the Court addressed the issue of personal separation of spouses, emphasizing how violent conduct, both physical and moral, constitutes serious violations of marital duties, sufficient to justify attributing the separation to the spouse who perpetrated them.

The Principle of Blame in Separation

The Court clarified that repeated violence inflicted by one spouse on the other not only justifies separation but also implies that the separation should be attributed to the violent spouse. This principle is fundamental as it exempts the judge from having to compare the conduct of the victim spouse with that of the perpetrator of the violence. In other words, the severity of the violence suffered by the victim is such that it does not require a comparative assessment.

Analysis of the Case

In the specific case, the Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Ancona, which had recognized the husband's violent and abusive conduct as the primary cause of the irreversible marital crisis. It is interesting to note that, despite the spouse accused of mistreatment having been acquitted in criminal proceedings, this did not affect the decision regarding the attribution of blame for the separation. This aspect highlights the autonomy of the civil sphere from the criminal one, confirming that the verification of violent conduct can lead to different outcomes in different legal contexts.

Violent conduct by one spouse towards the other - Ground for separation blame - Existence - Comparison with the behavior of the victim spouse - Necessity - Exclusion - Conditions - Case facts. Repeated physical and moral violence, inflicted by one spouse on the other, constitutes such serious violations of the duties arising from marriage as to found, in themselves, not only the pronouncement of personal separation, as causes determining the intolerability of cohabitation, but also the declaration of its attribution to their perpetrator; consequently, their ascertainment exempts the trial judge from the duty to proceed with the comparison, for the purpose of adopting the relevant pronouncements, with the behavior of the spouse who is the victim of the violence, given that these are acts which, by reason of their extreme gravity, are comparable only with homogeneous behaviors.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Judgment No. 22294 of 2024 represents an important step in protecting the rights of victims of domestic violence. It reaffirms that violent conduct in the marital context is unacceptable and justifies the attribution of separation blame, without the need to compare the victim's actions. This stance strengthens the protection of victims and sends a clear message against all forms of violence within affective relationships.