Judgment No. 8980 of March 30, 2023, by the Court of Cassation offers an important reflection on the theme of the obligation to provide maintenance for minors and the extension of this obligation to ascendants. In particular, it analyzes the issue of joinder of parties between paternal and maternal grandparents in the context of a modification of a maintenance order, highlighting the legal principles governing such situations and the responsibilities of family members.
In the case under review, the Court of Appeal of Rome had rejected the appeal of A.A., the paternal grandmother, who requested the modification of a previous maintenance order that imposed a contribution from the paternal grandparents. A.A. argued that the maternal grandmother should also be called upon to contribute to the maintenance expenses of the grandchild, E.E., as both parents were found to be in default. However, the lower court judge held that there was no need to extend the adversarial proceedings to F.F., the maternal grandmother, as she had not participated in the original proceedings.
The Court emphasized that the obligation of maintenance by ascendants is subsidiary and not joint and several, and that each co-obligor must be summoned when necessary to assess the overall economic conditions.
Judgment No. 8980 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation represents an important affirmation of the rights of minors and the responsibility of ascendants in ensuring their maintenance. It clarifies that, although the obligation to contribute is subsidiary, it is essential that all parties involved are considered in the proceedings to ensure a fair and complete assessment of each person's economic capacity. This approach not only protects the rights of minors but also promotes greater responsibility within family dynamics.