Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 25935 of 2024: the inadmissibility of the appeal for the fugitive.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the applicability of Article 581, paragraph 1-quater, of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the absent defendant declared a fugitive, highlighting the responsibilities of the defense attorney in the appeal process.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 28631 of 2024: Postponement of Sentence Execution for Health Reasons.

The 2024 ruling provides important insights on the deferment of sentence execution for health reasons, highlighting the rights of inmates and the responsibilities of the parole board.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Ruling No. 25939 of 2024: Interpretation of Communicative Facts in the Merits Judgment.

Let’s explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the role of the trial judge in the interpretation of communicative facts and the validity of the motivations related to the identification of the individuals involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26601 of 2024: The Accumulation of Served Sentences and the Issue of Prison Benefits.

The ruling no. 26601 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the importance of the accumulation of served sentences and their impact on prison benefits, analyzing the criteria established by Article 78 of the Penal Code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 28912 of 2024: Inadmissibility and Domicile in the Appeal to the Supreme Court.

Analysis of judgment no. 28912 of 2024 regarding the admissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation and the conditions concerning the defendant's declaration of residence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26250 of 2024: Reflections on Recidivism and Increased Sentencing.

Let's analyze ruling no. 26250 of 2024, which clarifies the conditions for the applicability of the minimum sentence increase in cases of repeated recidivism, with a focus on the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 30970 of 2024: Prisoner's Right to Be Visited by a Trusted Doctor.

Analysis of ruling no. 30970 of 2024, which clarifies the right of detained suspects to be visited by a trusted doctor, highlighting the conditions for the judge's authorization.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26575 of 2024: Constitution of Civil Party and Complaint.

Judgment No. 26575 of 2024 clarifies the equivalence between the non-revoked civil party constitution and the complaint, in light of the 'Cartabia' reform. Let us explore the meaning and implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 26615 of 2024: The Prevalence of the Transcript in the Regulation of Hearings.

In this article, we examine ruling no. 26615 of 2024, which clarifies the prevalence of the transcription report over the summary report in cases of discrepancies, providing important guidance for the proper management of reports in hearings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Aiding Illegal Immigration: Analysis of Judgment No. 28915 of 2024

An important ruling by the Court of Cassation highlights the criminal responsibilities related to aiding illegal immigration, emphasizing the inhuman and degrading treatment inflicted on migrants.