Bianucci Law Firm
Absent Defendant and Residence: Analysis of Judgment No. 27774 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome clarifies the importance of the declaration of domicile in the appeal of judgments for absent defendants, highlighting the burden of simultaneous submission with the appeal act.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 28046 of 2024: Appeal and Notification Defects

In this analysis, we delve into ruling no. 28046 of 2024, highlighting the importance of notifying the deposit notice of judgments and its impact on the appeal deadlines.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 28063 of 2024: Clarifications on Non Liable to Proceed and Appeals.

Let's analyze the recent ruling No. 28063 of 2024 that clarifies the methods of appealing against judgments of inadmissibility, highlighting the distinction between appeal and appeal to the Supreme Court.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 29959 of 2024: The Silent Withdrawal of Complaint.

Judgment no. 29959 of 2024 clarifies the conditions for the tacit withdrawal of a complaint by the legal representative of an entity, providing important legal and practical insights for managing complaints in the criminal context.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 27748 of 2024: Competition between Receiving Stolen Goods and Possession of Counterfeit Distinctive Signs.

Analysis of ruling no. 27748 of 2024 that clarifies the concurrence between the crime of receiving stolen goods and the possession of counterfeit distinguishing marks, analyzing the cases and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 28049 of 2024: Exemption from Punishment and Cohabitation More Uxorio.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Trieste clarifies the applicability of the exemption provided for in Article 649 of the Criminal Code to a cohabitant in a de facto union, confirming important legal principles regarding crimes against property.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 28050 of 2024: Clarity in the Request for Interrogation during Preliminary Investigations

Discover how the recent ruling no. 28050 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for requesting interrogation during preliminary investigations, emphasizing the importance of clarity and the absence of sacramental formulas.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 27813 of 2024: the Importance of Proper Procedure in Genetic Investigations

This ruling highlights how the violation of international protocols in DNA analysis can compromise the entire criminal process, rendering the results unusable as evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26507 of 2024: Arbitrary Exercise of One's Rights

The ruling no. 26507 of 2024 offers interesting insights on the crime of exercising one's rights arbitrarily and its relationship with the crime of damage. Let us analyze the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 28558 of 2024: Extinction of the Crime and Legal Costs

Let's analyze ruling no. 28558 of 2024, which clarifies the relationship between the extinction of the crime and the order to pay costs in favor of the civil party, highlighting the requirements set by current legislation.