• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 8295 4969
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it

Taxation of Proceeds from Unlawful Activities: Commentary on Order No. 307 of 2025

Recently, Order No. 307 of January 8, 2025, has attracted interest in the field of tax law, particularly regarding the taxation of proceeds derived from unlawful activities. The Court has established important principles concerning the tax period and the identification criteria for taxation. This article aims to clarify the content of the ruling, making it accessible even to those who are not experts in the field.

Context of the Ruling

In Order No. 307 of 8 January 2025, the Tax Section of the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal against the Regional Tax Commission of Venice's decision of 18 September 2019. The issue concerned the tax period to which income consisting of proceeds from unlawful activities should be allocated.

The Ruling's Maxim

Proceeds from unlawful activities - Taxation - Tax period - Identification - Criteria. In matters of IRPEF, the tax period to which income, consisting of proceeds from unlawful activities, should be imputed is identified by referring to the moment when availability of such proceeds is acquired, coinciding with the realization of the tax presupposition established by art. 1 of Presidential Decree No. 917 of 1986.

The principle concerns the period to which the income examined in the decision should be allocated. According to the official summary, acquiring availability of the proceeds coincides with the occurrence of the taxable event under Article 1 of Presidential Decree No. 917 of 1986. The Court does not contrast these as two different moments.

Practical Implications of the Ruling

Applying the Court's criterion requires identifying when the taxpayer acquired availability of the proceeds. The official summary addresses this timing issue; it is not a complete account of the tax treatment of every type of unlawful proceeds.

The Order therefore links the tax period to the availability of the income at issue, without introducing a separate taxation date that contrasts with the occurrence of the taxable event.

Conclusions

Order No. 307 of 2025 clarifies the timing criterion for allocating the income examined. Applying it to a particular case requires identifying when availability of the proceeds was acquired.

Source: Court of Cassation, official case-law digest. Civil Court of Cassation, Tax Section, Order No. 307 of 8 January 2025, Rv. 673821-01.

Bianucci Law Firm