Bianucci Law Firm
House Arrest and Electronic Bracelet: Analysis of Judgment No. 15939 of 2024

Judgment No. 15939 of 2024 clarifies the role of the electronic bracelet in house arrest, highlighting that it does not constitute a new coercive measure, but rather a mode of execution of the house arrest precaution.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 14895 of 2024: Appeals and House Arrests

In this article, we analyze Judgment No. 14895 of 2024, which clarifies the reasons for the inadmissibility of appeals concerning house arrest and the recent amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14095 of 2024: News on the Seizure and Possession of Narcotic Substances.

The recent ruling of 2024 clarifies the retroactive application of confiscation for disproportion in the context of the crime of unlawful possession of narcotic substances, highlighting the consequences of the amendment of Article 85-bis of Presidential Decree No. 309/1990.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 17470 of 2024: Pre-Trial Detention and the Relevance of the Period of Confinement

Analysis of ruling no. 17470 of 2024 regarding preventive custody and the irrelevance of the detention period for the replacement of the precautionary measure, with legislative and jurisprudential references.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 14710 of 2024: The Nullity of the Pronouncement for Violation of the Contradictory

The recent ruling no. 14710 of 2024 clarifies the implications of the new legislation on the prosecutability of offenses and the consequences of violating the principle of adversarial proceedings in criminal trials.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 15098 of 2024: Cartabia Reform and Ex Officio Proceedings in Criminal Law.

An analysis of ruling no. 15098 of 2024 that clarifies the methods of contesting aggravating factors in the context of the Cartabia Reform and their impact on the ex officio prosecution of offenses.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17455 of 2024: Cartabia Reform and Office-Driven Proceedings.

An analysis of ruling no. 17455 of 2024 that clarifies the ex officio proceedability of crimes subject to complaint following the Cartabia Reform. Discover the legal and practical implications for the public prosecutor and the defendants.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 13404 of 2024: Autonomy in the Position of Co-Defendants.

The very recent ruling No. 13404 of 2024 clarifies the autonomy of the procedural position of co-defendants regarding precautionary measures, highlighting the importance of individual assessment based on contribution and personality.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 14631 of 2024 and the Partial Revision of Building Offenses.

Let's analyze ruling no. 14631 of 2024 concerning the partial review of convictions in construction matters, clarifying the legal implications and the regulations governing its application.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16440 of 2024: Preclusion of Additional Grounds in the Remand Proceedings.

Analysis of ruling no. 16440 of 2024, which establishes the preclusion of submitting additional grounds in the appeal judgment, clarifying the limits of the criminal procedure.