Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16351 of 2024: Reform of Res Judicata and Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius.

The ruling no. 16351 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Milan clarifies the limits of the prohibition of 'reformatio in peius' in relation to the annulment of the judgment, highlighting the autonomy of the new proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16352 of 2024: Balancing Test between Circumstances in Continuous Crimes.

Let's analyze the ruling no. 16352 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the balancing assessment between circumstances in ongoing offenses, highlighting the importance of the circumstances related to the most serious offense.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14653 of 2024: Recidivism and Interest in Appealing.

Judgment No. 14653 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the issue of recidivism and the defendant's interest in appealing the judgment, even without an increase in penalty. Let's explore the details and legal implications together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 14657 of 2024: The Mandatory Translation in Precautionary Measures.

Ruling No. 14657 of 2024 clarifies the importance of translation for non-Italian-speaking defendants in precautionary procedures, establishing that the absence of translation nullifies the measures adopted.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14654 of 2024: Equivalent Confiscation and Plurality of Offenses

Let's explore the recent ruling No. 14654 of 2024, which outlines the limits of equivalent confiscation in the case of multiple offenses, clarifying when the extension of confiscation to profits not attributed to the defendant is legitimate.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 13714 of 2024: Alternative Procedure and Appeal in Absence.

An analysis of the recent ruling No. 13714 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the applicability of the burden of appeal in the case of alternative procedural resolution requested by the defense. Let's explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Sentence No. 15429 of 2024: Extortion and Mafia Method

Let's analyze judgment no. 15429 of 2024, which addresses the issue of 'silent' extortion threats by mafia members, exploring the legal implications and the aggravating circumstances provided by the Penal Code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Effects of a Judge's Abstention: Analysis of Judgment No. 16481 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro clarifies the effects of acts performed by a recused judge, highlighting the importance of the declaration of effectiveness for procedural validity.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15430 of 2024: The Devolutive Principle in the Appeal Proceedings.

Judgment No. 15430 of 2024 clarifies important aspects related to the devolutive principle in the appeal process, highlighting the illegitimacy of the ex officio dissolution of the continuity bond, a crucial issue in criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 16057 of 2024: The Independent Appealability of Confirmatory Measures.

The recent ruling no. 16057 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the rules regarding the appealability of merely confirmatory measures, establishing the impossibility of independent appeal and the reasons for this legal choice.