Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 21254 of 30/07/2024 on the Establishment of Easements.

An analysis of ruling no. 21254 of 2024 that clarifies the requirements for the establishment of predial servitudes without the use of sacramental formulas. Discover how the will of the parties can be sufficient to establish a right.

Bianucci Law Firm
Third Party Ordinary Opposition: Analysis of Judgment No. 21230 of 2024

In this analysis of ruling no. 21230 of July 30, 2024, we explore the prerequisites for ordinary third-party opposition, providing clarifications on how to protect autonomous rights in case of legal prejudice.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 21300 of 30/07/2024: Jurisdiction in the Opposition Proceedings Against Injunction Decree.

The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bologna clarifies the implications of raising the objection of territorial incompetence in the opposition proceedings to a payment order, establishing the importance of the judge's jurisdiction in determining legal costs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 21397 of 2024: Financial intermediation and joint liability.

Let’s analyze the recent order no. 21397 of July 30, 2024, which clarifies the limits of application of administrative sanctions in the context of financial intermediation, highlighting the importance of substantive law and its impact on violations that occurred prior to the entry into force of the new provisions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Contract Resolution and Deposit: Commentary on Ordinance No. 21317 of 2024

Let’s analyze Ordinance No. 21317 of July 30, 2024, which clarifies the relationship between withdrawal and termination of the contract, highlighting the non-novelty of the termination request compared to legitimate withdrawal.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 21138 of 2024: Compensation for Unjust Enrichment and Recovery Function.

Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the limits of compensation for unjust enrichment, highlighting the differences between recovery function and corresponding function.

Bianucci Law Firm
Administrative seizure of a vehicle and reimbursement of expenses: the case of ruling no. 21119 of 2024.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 21119 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the administrative seizure of vehicles and the right to reimbursement of custody expenses, with particular attention to the ten-year statute of limitations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Professional Fees and Passive Solidarity: Commentary on Ordinance No. 20922 of 2024

Let’s analyze the recent Order No. 20922 of 2024, which clarifies the issue of passive solidarity in professional fees for lawyers, highlighting the importance of unified legal services even in extrajudicial activities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 20949 of 2024: Consob Sanctions and Retroactivity of Lex Mitior.

Analysis of ruling no. 20949 of 2024 concerning the punitive nature of Consob sanctions and the applicability of the principle of retroactivity of the lex mitior, with references to Italian and European regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Compensation of the Judicial Administrator: Commentary on Order No. 20975 of 2024

Analysis of the recent ruling on the payment of the judicial administrator's fee in cases of preventive seizure, with a focus on regulatory and jurisprudential implications.