When a couple faces the end of their marriage, determining the financial terms often becomes the point of greatest friction. The issue becomes particularly delicate when one of the spouses holds an executive or high-level managerial position. In these cases, compensation is not solely comprised of the monthly base salary but includes a series of complex variable components such as annual bonuses, long-term incentive plans (LTIs), stock options, and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs).
As a divorce lawyer in Milan, a city at the pulsating heart of the Italian economy and home to numerous multinational corporations, I frequently face the challenge of correctly classifying these compensation items. The main problem lies in determining if and how these sums, often accrued but not yet received (or received with a delay), should be included in the calculation of the divorce alimony or in determining the share of severance pay (TFR) due to the ex-spouse. An inaccurate assessment can lead to significant economic imbalances, prejudicing the rights of one of the parties.
Italian jurisprudence, through numerous rulings by the Court of Cassation, has established the principle of comprehensive income in assessing the economic capacity of spouses. This means that for the purpose of quantifying maintenance or divorce alimony, the judge must consider all economic benefits available to the individual, including supplementary and variable payments.
However, the deferred nature of some bonuses (such as LTI plans that accrue over multiple years) raises significant technical issues. It is necessary to distinguish between what has effectively been acquired by the executive's assets during the marital cohabitation and what, instead, compensates for work activity after separation. Furthermore, even for the purpose of calculating the 40% share of severance pay due to the ex-spouse (Art. 12-bis Law 898/1970), it is crucial to analyze whether bonuses are of a compensatory nature and if they were included in the calculation base of the severance pay.
Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert family law attorney in Milan, adopts a rigorous analysis method for managing divorces involving executive profiles. We do not limit ourselves to reading tax returns, which often offer a partial or outdated snapshot of the economic reality. Our approach involves a detailed examination of employment contracts, stock option plans, and company regulations related to bonuses.
The firm's strategy is based on the correct temporal allocation of resources. It is essential, for example, to understand the vesting period (accrual) of stock options to determine whether they are the result of work effort expended during the marriage or not. As an attorney specializing in inheritance and family law, Avv. Marco Bianucci collaborates with financial consultants when necessary to correctly value these assets, ensuring that the client, whether the executive or the economically weaker spouse, achieves a fair, transparent, and unassailable settlement of financial relations.
Yes, generally bonuses accrued during the period of the marriage, even if paid later, are considered part of the spouse's economic capacity. However, it is crucial to analyze the bonus regulations to understand if it is exclusively linked to past results or if it requires future tenure with the company, a factor that could influence its evaluation in court.
Stock options represent an option right and not an immediate asset. If the option was exercised during the marriage, the resulting shares enter the marital community (if present) or the assessable assets. If the option is not yet exercisable, the matter is more complex and requires a technical analysis to determine if the latent value should be considered for divorce alimony purposes.
An ex-spouse entitled to divorce alimony and not remarried has the right to a percentage of the severance pay received by the other spouse, attributable to the years in which the employment relationship coincided with the marriage. If performance bonuses and other bonuses are computable in the TFR according to law and collective agreements, they will increase the base on which to calculate the ex-spouse's share.
In the case of joint divorce or assisted negotiation, parties have broad contractual autonomy. Lump-sum (one-off) agreements can be reached that close all future claims, including those on bonuses and subsequent economic improvements. This solution is often recommended by Avv. Marco Bianucci to ensure a definitive and certain closure of financial relations between the parties.
Managing executive bonuses and incentive plans in separation proceedings requires specific expertise and an analytical approach. If you are an executive or the spouse of a manager and are facing the end of your marriage, it is crucial not to leave anything to chance. Avv. Marco Bianucci receives clients at his office in Milan at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, to examine your financial situation and define the most effective strategy to protect your interests.