Bianucci Law Firm
Embezzlement and Gambling Addiction: Reflections on the Supreme Court Ruling

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on embezzlement, particularly regarding the mental capacity of the defendant affected by gambling addiction, provides important insights into responsibilities in the public sector.

Bianucci Law Firm
Criminal Liability of Employers: Analysis of the Recent Supreme Court Ruling

The Court of Cassation returns to address criminal liability in the event of workplace accidents, highlighting the implications for employers and the need for proper safety management on construction sites.

Bianucci Law Firm
Domestic Abuse: The Ruling of the Court of Cassation and Its Reflections.

Analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding mistreatment in a nursing home, focusing on the responsibility of healthcare workers and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Supreme Court Criminal Ruling No. 31704/2024: Precautionary Measures and Domestic Violence

We explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding precautionary measures in cases of domestic violence and stalking, highlighting the applicable legal principles and the implications for the protection of victims.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraud and Undue Perception of Public Grants: The Very Recent Ruling of the Court of Cassation

Analysis of the ruling by the Court of Cassation that annulled the house arrest order for improperly received public subsidies during the Covid-19 emergency, clarifying the distinction between fraud and improper receipt of benefits.

Bianucci Law Firm
Obligation to report changes in assets: the Court of Cassation (Judgment 18474/2024) clarifies the starting date for the inheritance

The Court of Cassation, with the 2024 ruling no. 18474, has delineated a crucial point regarding the obligation to report changes in assets under Article 30 of Law 646/1982, establishing that the deadline for inherited assets runs from acceptance and not from the opening of the estate. An in-depth analysis to understand the criminal implications and to protect oneself best.

Bianucci Law Firm
Court of Cassation: Omission of Communication and the Crime of Undue Receipt of Public Funds (Judgment no. 11969/2024)

The Cassation clarifies the boundaries of art. 316-ter c.p., outlining criminal liability for the omission of communication of conditions preventing the receipt of social security benefits. An analysis for businesses and professionals on the pitfalls of undue receipt of public funds and legal consequences.

Bianucci Law Firm
Principle of Trust and Road Accidents: The Obligation to Foresee Others' Imprudence according to the Supreme Court (Judgment 8870/2024)

The Supreme Court, with Judgment 8870/2024, redefines the limits of the principle of trust in road traffic. Discover how the obligation to foresee others' imprudence, even of cyclists or pedestrians, can lead to manslaughter liability and what precautions to take for safe and aware driving.

Bianucci Law Firm
Cassation no. 11209/2024: concurrence between domestic abuse and stalking after the end of cohabitation

The Supreme Court clarifies when domestic abuse under art. 572 c.p. can be combined with aggravated stalking under art. 612-bis c.p. in the presence of cohabitation cessation, despite the continuation of shared parenthood. Analysis of the decision and its practical impact.

Bianucci Law Firm
Unjust detention and security measures: the Court of Cassation with sentence no. 13539/2024 opens to compensation ex art. 314 c.p.p.

The Supreme Court, with decision no. 13539/2024, clarifies that even deprivation of liberty resulting from the application of the "house of labour" security measure entitles to compensation for unjust detention. Let's analyze the content, normative bases, and practical implications for defense and clients.