Ordinance no. 28862/2025 of the Court of Cassation establishes the limits for challenging a payment demand. Discover why it is not possible to claim the statute of limitations expired before the notification of unappealed preliminary acts.
With Ordinance no. 29613 of 2025, the Joint Sessions of the Court of Cassation clarify the boundaries of jurisdiction between ordinary and administrative courts regarding accredited healthcare services and the recovery of undue payments by the ASL due to a facility's lack of requirements.
The Joint Sections of the Court of Cassation, in Order no. 29608/2025, clarify the boundary between ordinary and administrative courts regarding the RAI license fee. Discover why the claim for declaratory judgment on the illegitimacy of the fee reduction falls under ordinary jurisdiction.
With Order no. 29144/2025, the Joint Chambers of the Court of Cassation clarify that claims for damages by equivalent pursuant to Article 112 of the Code of Administrative Procedure fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Administrative Judge, ensuring faster and more concentrated protection for the citizen.
With Order no. 30770 of 2025, the United Sections of the Court of Cassation clarify the boundaries of the judicial review of Council of State decisions, distinguishing between denial of jurisdiction and mere procedural error in the assessment of incidental issues.
With ordinance no. 30659 of 2025, the Joint Sections of the Court of Cassation clarify the limits of the extraordinary appeal pursuant to Art. 111 of the Constitution against decisions of the administrative judge regarding anti-mafia interdictory measures, excluding the violation of personal liberty.
Court of Cassation Order No. 29708/2025 clarifies the requirements for conviction under Article 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure in cases of accelerated proceedings. Discover when sanctions apply to the appellant, even in the presence of additional grounds for inadmissibility.
With Order no. 29686/2025, the Joint Sessions of the Court of Cassation clarify the allocation of jurisdiction in cases of opposition to a notice of mortgage for public funding debts. Discover why jurisdiction lies with the ordinary court rather than the tax court.
With Ordinance no. 29682 of 2025, the Joint Sections of the Court of Cassation clarify the boundaries of jurisdiction regarding payment notices issued for private consortium charges, excluding both the tax court and the accounting court in favor of the ordinary court.
Who decides on child custody if separation proceedings and juvenile proceedings are both pending? The Court of Cassation, with Order no. 28901 of 2025, clarifies the criteria of jurisdiction between the ordinary court and the juvenile court prior to the Cartabia reform, outlining the boundaries of the vis attractiva.