With judgment no. 26673/2025, the Court of Cassation establishes that urban areas in the F/1 cadastral category must be taxed for IMU purposes as developable land, based on their market value, rather than as plots or buildings.
The Court of Cassation, through ordinance no. 26980 of 2025, has clarified that ICI assessment notices signed by a non-managerial municipal official are fully valid. We examine how the principle of specialty prevails over the general provisions of the Consolidated Law on Local Authorities.
Who is required to pay ICI on state-owned areas under concession? The Court of Cassation, in judgment no. 27259 of 12/10/2025, clarifies the taxpayer's identity, ruling out the relevance of transfers of enjoyment to third parties.
The Court of Cassation, with order no. 27238 of 2025, clarifies the burden of proof for VAT deduction. To exercise the right, it is not necessary to demonstrate actual payment, as the substantive and formal requirements of the transaction are sufficient. We explore the details of this significant decision.
With ordinance no. 27235 of October 11, 2025, the Court of Cassation establishes that the dissolution of an unincorporated association during a lawsuit does not result in the automatic loss of legal standing. Former representatives remain in office under the prorogatio regime.
The Court of Cassation, with Ordinance no. 27229 of 2025, clarifies the conditions for extending the reward regime of shortened tax assessment deadlines to capital companies. We examine the requirements necessary to benefit from this significant tax relief.
The Court of Cassation, through Order no. 27096/2025, clarifies the conditions for the tax deductibility of losses on receivables arising from commercial settlements. We examine why initiating lengthy and costly legal proceedings to prove debtor insolvency is no longer required.
With order no. 28319 of 2025, the Court of Cassation establishes that the service of a tax appeal to the party in person rather than to the appointed counsel is voidable and not non-existent, thereby allowing for the remediation of the defect and upholding the right to a fair trial.
With ordinance no. 28297/2025, the Court of Cassation establishes that the mere shipping receipt of a registered letter or telegram is sufficient to presume receipt of the document. The burden of proving otherwise, or that the envelope was empty, lies with the recipient. Learn the details.
How and when can a taxpayer correct errors made in their tax return? Court of Cassation ordinance no. 28398/2025 clarifies the deadlines for supplementary declarations, refund requests, and protections within tax litigation.