The recent order no. 16007 of June 7, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers important clarifications on the succession of rights in the event of a business unit transfer. This aspect is particularly relevant for companies designated by the Guarantee Fund for Victims of Road Accidents, as demonstrated by the case under examination, which discusses the legitimacy of the transferee's succession to the disputed right with the transferor.
The Court had to examine a situation where a business unit, including relationships related to the Guarantee Fund, had been transferred with the authorization of IVASS. The headnote of the ruling states:
Company designated by the Guarantee Fund for Victims of Road Accidents - Transfer of business unit authorized by IVASS - Succession of the transferee to the disputed right with the transferor - Suitability - Existence - Case. The transfer by the company designated for the Guarantee Fund for Victims of Road Accidents of a business unit, including relationships related to the Fund itself, if authorized by IVASS, is suitable to determine the particular succession of the transferee to the right already disputed in court with the transferor. (In application of the principle, the Supreme Court affirmed the standing to appeal of Generali Italia s.p.a., as transferee of the insurance business unit, given IVASS's authorization for the transfer by spin-off of the "complex of assets, liabilities, and contractual relationships pertaining to the insurance activity of Assicurazioni Generali s.p.a.'s Italian Directorate," the original company designated by the Guarantee Fund, which had already been established in the first instance).
This headnote highlights the validity of the succession of rights in situations involving a business unit transfer, provided that such transfer is authorized by a competent body like IVASS. This represents legal protection for transferees, allowing them to step into pre-existing rights and obligations, including any appeal rights.
The ruling has a direct impact on victims of road accidents, as the Guarantee Fund is responsible for ensuring compensation for damages caused by road accidents, especially when the responsible party is uninsured or unidentifiable. The following are some key points related to this issue:
In conclusion, order no. 16007 of 2024 represents an important development in the field of insurance law and civil liability. It emphasizes how the succession of rights can occur smoothly and securely, ensuring continuity and protection for victims of road accidents. The ruling offers food for thought on how to manage legal disputes in the context of business transfers and on the importance of supervision by regulatory bodies such as IVASS.