Omission of the table of prohibited games: commentary on judgment no. 23947 of 2023

The recent judgment no. 23947 of March 21, 2023, has generated significant interest in the field of public safety and the regulation of public establishments. In particular, the Court addressed the issue of the omission of the display of the table of prohibited games, a crucial aspect for commercial activities offering games and betting. The decision of the Palermo court highlighted the responsibilities of operators and the sanctions provided by law, offering food for thought for all those operating in the sector.

Regulatory context

The judgment in question is based on provisions contained in the Consolidated Law on Public Security Laws (T.U.L.P.S.), particularly articles 17, 110, and 221. These articles regulate the display of the table of prohibited games and the legal consequences in case of non-compliance. In particular, article 110, paragraph 1 of Royal Decree of June 18, 1931, no. 773, requires that managers of premises where gambling takes place visibly display the table with prohibited games, while article 195 establishes the procedures for its validation.

Display of the table of prohibited games - Omission - Offense under art. 17 in relation to art. 110, paragraph 1, T.U.L.P.S. - Existence - Display without the procedures prescribed by art. 195 of the implementing regulation - Sanction under art. 221, paragraph 2, T.U.L.P.S. - Existence. The omission of the display of the table indicating games prohibited by the Quaestor, as prescribed by art. 110, paragraph 1, Royal Decree of June 18, 1931, no. 773, is punished by the aforementioned art. 17 of the Royal Decree, while the sanction referred to in the subsequent art. 221, paragraph 2, of the aforementioned Royal Decree applies in cases where the table, duly posted, is not kept displayed in a visible place or is not correctly validated pursuant to art. 195 of the relevant implementing regulation.

Implications of the judgment

The decision of the Palermo court highlights the importance of complying with regulations regarding the display of the table of prohibited games. The Court established that the omission of such display constitutes an offense, with consequent sanctions. In particular, if the table is not displayed visibly or is not correctly validated, the operator may incur severe sanctions, as provided for by article 221, paragraph 2 of the T.U.L.P.S.

• Operator responsibilities: every manager must ensure the correct display of the table.
• Applicable sanctions: in case of non-compliance, criminal and administrative sanctions may be imposed.
• Controls by authorities: it is essential that the competent authorities carry out periodic checks to ensure compliance with regulations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment no. 23947 of 2023 represents an important reminder for all operators, emphasizing the need to comply with regulations concerning public games. The correct display of the table of prohibited games is not only a legal obligation but also a fundamental measure to ensure citizen safety and the legality of commercial activities. Operators must pay attention to these obligations to avoid legal consequences and sanctions that could jeopardize their business.