The end of a marriage necessitates reorganizing not only emotional and family life but also economic life. One of the most thorny and frequent issues we encounter concerns the fate of the family home and, in particular, the payment of mortgage installments when the property is assigned to one of the spouses, often the one with whom the children are placed. It is common to think that whoever stays in the house must bear all expenses, or conversely, that whoever leaves is freed from all burdens, but the legal reality is more complex. As a divorce lawyer in Milan, lawyer Marco Bianucci analyzes these dynamics daily, offering clarity on the parties' obligations and rights.
The fundamental starting point is to distinguish the internal relationships between spouses from the external relationships with the bank. The credit institution, in fact, is a third party with respect to the separation: if the mortgage is joint, the principle of joint and several liability applies. This means that for the bank, both spouses remain debtors for the entire amount, regardless of who lives in the property or what the separation judge has decided regarding the assignment of the house. If one of them stops paying, the bank can legitimately demand the payment of the entire installment from the other.
In Italian law, the obligation to pay the mortgage falls on the owners of the property, not necessarily on whoever lives there. The assignment of the marital home is a measure taken in the interest of the children to ensure their environmental continuity, but it does not alter the ownership of the asset or the mortgage contract. Therefore, if the house is jointly owned 50%, both spouses are obliged to pay their share of the mortgage, even the one who was forced to move elsewhere. This situation often creates a strong sense of injustice in the excluded spouse, who finds themselves having to pay rent for their new home and simultaneously half of the mortgage for a house they cannot enjoy.
However, the payment of the mortgage by the spouse who no longer lives in the house is not without legal consequences. Such an outlay is often considered by the judge when determining the alimony payment. If the economically stronger spouse pays the entire mortgage installment for the house where the children and the ex-partner live, this contribution can be evaluated as a form of fulfilling the maintenance obligation, leading to a reduction in the monthly cash alimony.
If one spouse pays the entire installments of a joint mortgage after separation, they may acquire a credit right against the other for their share (recourse action). However, jurisprudence is not always unanimous: if the full payment is made spontaneously and without written agreements, it could be interpreted as fulfilling family solidarity duties, preventing a subsequent request for restitution. For this reason, the intervention of an expert professional is crucial to establish from the outset whether the sums paid are to be considered a loan, an advance, or indirect maintenance.
At Studio Legale Bianucci in via Alberto da Giussano in Milan, we address the issue of mortgages and the marital home with a pragmatic and forward-thinking approach. Lawyer Marco Bianucci, an expert in family law, does not merely manage the emergency but works to build solid separation agreements that prevent future disputes. Our strategy involves a detailed analysis of both parties' earning capacity and the remaining mortgage balance.
Our goal is to find a sustainable economic balance. We often negotiate agreements that involve the assuming spouse taking over the mortgage in exchange for a waiver of part of the maintenance or a transfer of ownership shares, where the bank permits it. When this is not possible, we ensure that the separation petition clearly specifies the basis on which the installment payments are made, protecting the client from ambiguities that could prove costly in the future. Contractual clarity is the only tool to protect the real estate assets and the financial serenity of the parties involved.
No, with respect to the bank, the obligation remains unchanged if the mortgage is joint. Stopping payment exposes both spouses to the risk of foreclosure on the property. In relationships between spouses, non-payment can be regulated differently but requires a formal agreement or a judge's decision.
The separation judge cannot modify the contract with the bank, but they can establish, in the internal relationships between spouses, who should bear the expense. Often, if one spouse takes on the entire mortgage, this is balanced by a reduction in the alimony due to the other or the children.
Generally no, if the assignment of the home was ordered by the judge in the interest of the children. The right of habitation granted prevails over the ownership right of the other spouse, who cannot claim an occupancy fee, except in exceptional cases or different agreements between the parties.
This is often the best solution for settling financial matters. The spouse who keeps the house buys the other's share and takes over the remaining mortgage. However, it is essential to obtain a release from the bank for the selling spouse, otherwise, they would remain a guarantor in case of future non-payment of installments.
Managing a mortgage during separation requires specific expertise to avoid mistakes that can compromise your financial future. If you are going through this delicate phase and need clarity on your obligations and rights, lawyer Marco Bianucci is available to evaluate your specific case. We receive by appointment at our Milan office.