Regulation of Jurisdiction and Court Costs: The Clarity of Order No. 16219/2025
Order No. 16219/2025 of the Court of Cassation clarifies a crucial aspect of court costs: the appeal for regulation of jurisdiction has an indeterminate value, with significant implications for the assessment of fees and the management of civil disputes.
Statute of Limitations and Summary Proceedings: The Court of Cassation Clarifies the Interruptive Effect (Order No. 16300/2025)
An in-depth analysis of Order No. 16300/2025 of the Court of Cassation, which outlines the temporal boundaries of the interruption of the statute of limitations in summary proceedings. Discover why mere registration with the court registry is insufficient and the crucial importance of notification for the protection of your rights and the preservation of patrimonial guarantees.
Judgment of Remand and Enrollment in the Roll: The Court of Cassation Clarifies with Judgment No. 16211/2025
The Supreme Court, with judgment 16211 of 2025, clarifies the nature of the post-Cassation judgment of remand, specifying the plaintiff's obligations in reassumption and the role of the registrar. An in-depth analysis to understand the practical implications on the reactivation of civil proceedings and the responsibilities of the parties.
Contracts and Covid-19: The Court of Cassation (Judgment no. 16113 of 2025) and the Issue of Performance Reduction
The Court of Cassation, with Judgment no. 16113 of 2025, clarifies the impact of anti-Covid measures on contracts with continuous performance: Article 91 of the Cura Italia Decree excludes liability for non-performance and damages, but does not grant an automatic right to judicial reduction of performance. Discover the true legal remedies for supervening excessive onerousness.
The Supreme Court on the Admissibility of Counterclaims in Opposition to a Payment Order: Analysis of Order No. 16162/2025
An in-depth analysis of the Cassation Court's Order No. 16162/2025, which outlines the boundaries of counterclaims in opposition to a payment order. Discover the implications of this ruling for procedural strategy and the protection of rights, understanding when and how it is possible to expand the scope of the proceedings.
Tacit Acceptance of Inheritance Through Compensation Action: Supreme Court Order No. 16594/2025
An in-depth analysis of Supreme Court Order No. 16594/2025, clarifying how pursuing a legal action for damages in the name of the deceased parent can constitute proof of tacit acceptance of the inheritance. Discover the conditions and implications for heirs and active standing in Italian succession law.
Medical Residents' Compensation: The Supreme Court and Proof of Course Equivalence (Order 16407/2025)
Order 16407/2025 of the Supreme Court clarifies the stringent evidentiary requirements for medical residents' compensation, emphasizing that mere terminological similarity of courses is insufficient. Discover how to prove equivalence and protect your rights in a complex European context.
Health Damage and Loss of Sensory Function: The Qualitative Distinction in Assessment according to Order no. 16328/2025
The Court of Cassation, with Order no. 16328/2025, clarifies a fundamental principle for health damage compensation: the total loss of a sense is not a mere aggravation, but a qualitatively different event that requires a specific and personalized assessment, overcoming the quantitative logic and ensuring fair compensation for the definitive impairment of vital functions.
Insurance on Another's Property: The Court of Cassation and the Identification of the Beneficiary in Ruling No. 16212 of 2025
Ruling 16212/2025 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the nature of insurance on property taken out by a non-owner: it is always on behalf of another, for the benefit of the titleholder. We analyze the consequences for lease and rental agreements, defining the insurable interest and the beneficiary. Essential for understanding insurance law.
RCA Insurance and Subjective Undue Payment: Insurer's Right to Reimbursement for Unexcusable Error (Order No. 16213/2025)
A thorough analysis of Cassation Order 16213/2025 clarifies the limits and possibilities for RCA insurers to recover sums paid due to unexcusable error. Discover how subjective undue payment and subrogation ex art. 2036 c.c. protect insurers, even in complex accidents involving the Road Victim's Fund.