Bianucci Law Firm
Tacit Acceptance of Inheritance by Representative: The Supreme Court with Order no. 15301/2025

An in-depth analysis of Supreme Court Order no. 15301/2025, clarifying the complex mechanisms of tacit acceptance of inheritance when a representative acts and its implications on subsequent renunciation, offering crucial insights for heirs and succession law professionals.

Bianucci Law Firm
Receipt in Notarial Deed and Out-of-Court Confession: Cassation 15097/2025 Clarifies the Limits of Judicial Assessment

The Supreme Court, with ruling no. 15097 of 2025, addresses the delicate balance between the privileged faith of a receipt issued in a public deed and the value of extra-deed declarations. Discover how the judge of merit must evaluate conflicting evidence of payment, avoiding automatisms and ensuring the correct application of articles 2730 and 2735 of the Italian Civil Code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Liability of the Public Security Authorization Holder: Supreme Court Ruling No. 14825 of 2025

The Supreme Court of Cassation, with Ruling No. 14825/2025, reiterates a fundamental principle for those operating with public security authorizations: the holder's liability for non-compliance, even if committed by employees. An in-depth analysis of supervisory obligations and legal consequences for traders and professionals in the sector.

Bianucci Law Firm
Showcase Prices: The Court of Cassation Reaffirms the Obligation of Direct Visibility (Order No. 14826/2025)

Order No. 14826 of 2025 from the Court of Cassation establishes a fundamental principle for retail trade: the price of displayed products must be immediately and directly visible to the consumer. Discover why an internal tag is not sufficient and what the implications are for merchants and customer rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Standing to Sue of a Co-owner: Supreme Court Order no. 14829 of 2025 on Common Works

An important Order from the Court of Cassation (no. 14829/2025) clarifies the standing of an individual co-owner to sue the contractor for defects in works on common areas. Discover why only the administrator can represent the condominium in court and the implications of this decision for all owners.

Bianucci Law Firm
Lawyer's Liability: An Analysis of Supreme Court Ruling 15526/2025

We delve into the significant Supreme Court Ruling 15526/2025 concerning the civil liability of lawyers. Discover when a legal professional is liable for negligence, the duty of qualified diligence, and the implications for the right to fees, with a clear and accessible analysis for clients and legal practitioners.

Bianucci Law Firm
The Right to a Family Tomb: The Court of Cassation Clarifies Legitimate Heirs with Order no. 15432 of 2025

An in-depth analysis of Order no. 15432 of 2025 by the Court of Cassation, which defines the boundaries of the ius sepulchri gentilizio. Discover who has the right to be buried in the family tomb and the criteria guiding the Supreme Court's decisions regarding blood ties and marriage, a topic of great emotional and legal significance.

Bianucci Law Firm
Condominium Clauses and Enforceability Against Third Parties: The Importance of Transcription in Ruling 15341 of 2025

The Supreme Court, with ruling no. 15341 of 2025, clarifies the requirements for the enforceability of condominium clauses limiting exclusive ownership against third-party buyers, emphasizing the crucial importance of correct transcription of reciprocal easements. An in-depth analysis to understand when a use prohibition becomes binding and how to protect oneself.

Bianucci Law Firm
Condominium Administration: When Do Expenses Require a Meeting? The Clarification from the Court of Cassation with Ruling 15346/2025

Explore the crucial distinction between ordinary and extraordinary administration acts in condominiums, as outlined by the Court of Cassation in ruling 15346/2025. An in-depth analysis of the criteria of "normality" and "significant economic burden" that determine the need for assembly approval, essential for co-owners and administrators.

Bianucci Law Firm
Necessary joinder in the referral judgment: the Court of Cassation establishes the limits with Order no. 15400 of 2025

We explore the important Order of the Court of Cassation no. 15400/2025 which clarifies the delicate issue of necessary joinder in the referral judgment. Discover when it is no longer possible to object to the lack of integrity of the adversarial principle and what the consequences are for the stability of civil proceedings, offering crucial guidance for legal professionals and parties involved.