Bianucci Law Firm
Administrative Detention of Foreign Nationals and Custodial Sentences: Cassation Court Ruling 32338/2025

The Court of Cassation, with ruling 32338 of 2025, clarifies a crucial aspect of administrative detention of foreign nationals: the execution of such a measure is suspended during the serving of a custodial sentence. This pronouncement redefines the temporal limits and procedures for convicted international protection applicants, with significant implications for immigration management and rights protection.

Bianucci Law Firm
Administrative Detention of Foreign Nationals: The Court of Cassation (Judgment no. 32342/2025) and the Right to Expanded Review

The Supreme Court of Cassation, with judgment no. 32342 of 2025, clarifies a crucial aspect of the administrative detention of foreign nationals: the possibility of raising issues in the review phase that were not raised during the validation, emphasizing the precautionary nature of the measure and the absence of res judicata. An in-depth analysis of the implications for the rights of detained individuals and the reception system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Illegitimacy of Foreigner Detention Extension: Analysis of Supreme Court Ruling No. 32354 of 2025

The Court of Cassation, with ruling No. 32354 of 2025, has clarified the time limits for the extension of administrative detention of foreigners in Centers for the Repatriation of Aliens (CPR). Discover why an order issued after the deadline expires is illegitimate and the implications of this decision for the protection of fundamental rights and expulsion procedures in Italy, ensuring the continuity and legitimacy of personal liberty restrictive measures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Facilitation of Immigration and Exploitation of Prostitution: the Supreme Court with Judgment no. 30886 of 2025 clarifies the concurrence of offenses

An in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court of Cassation Judgment no. 30886 of 2025 which clarifies the distinction between facilitation of illegal immigration aimed at prostitution and its exploitation, outlining the configurability of the material concurrence of offenses and the implications for the protection of victims and the fight against organized crime.

Bianucci Law Firm
Administrative Detention of Foreigners: The Court of Cassation Clarifies the Timeliness of Extensions (Judgment No. 30294/2025)

The Court of Cassation, with judgment No. 30294 of 2025, defines the timeliness of extensions in the administrative detention of foreigners. A crucial analysis of the decision that establishes a clear criterion for calculating deadlines, ensuring legal certainty and protecting fundamental rights in light of recent legislative changes concerning immigration.

Bianucci Law Firm
Detention of Foreign Nationals: The Supreme Court Reaffirms Proportionality Assessment (Judgment no. 30357/2025)

The Court of Cassation, with judgment no. 30357 of 2025, outlines a clear path for district judges: in the administrative detention of foreign nationals, the mere absence of a passport is insufficient. Careful proportionality assessment and the search for less burdensome alternative measures are essential, in line with European law and fundamental rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Daytime Isolation and Limits of the Supervisory Magistrate: Cassation Court Ruling no. 31127 of 2025

The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 31127 of 2025, has outlined the boundaries of the Supervisory Magistrate's powers regarding the execution of daytime isolation, reaffirming its nature as an effective and ineliminable criminal sanction. A crucial analysis for penitentiary law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Normative Continuity between Article 6 of Law 895/1967 and Article 421-bis of the Italian Criminal Code: The Cassation Court Ruling No. 32132 of 2025

The Court of Cassation, with ruling No. 32132 of 2025, clarifies the normative continuity between the former offense of public intimidation with weapons (Article 6 of Law 895/1967) and the new Article 421-bis of the Criminal Code. It highlights how, despite the repeal and introduction of new provisions, the substance of the criminal conduct and its specific purpose remain unaltered in Italian criminal law, with significant implications for ongoing proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive Measures: The Court of Cassation on the Re-evaluation of Social Dangerousness (Judgment no. 30070/2025)

An important ruling by the Court of Cassation, judgment no. 30070/2025, redefines the boundaries of the application of personal preventive measures, clarifying the indispensable need for a current assessment of social dangerousness after detention. An essential analysis for understanding individual rights and guarantees within the Italian criminal justice system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Retroactivity of Criminal Laws and Obstacle Crimes: Constitutional Court Ruling No. 32 of 2020

An in-depth analysis of the historic ruling No. 32 of 2020 by the Constitutional Court, which clarifies the limits to the retroactive application of penitentiary provisions less favorable to obstacle crimes, with particular regard to house arrest. Discover how the principle of non-retroactivity protects the rights of convicts in the Italian legal system.