Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 30040/2024: Wiretaps and Serious Indications.

The recent ruling no. 30040 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the legitimacy review concerning wiretaps and the assessment of the evidentiary weight. Let’s explore the details and legal implications together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 30041 of 2024: Refusal of Assessment for Drug Use and Criminal Relevance

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the configurability of the crime of refusal to undergo testing for drug use, highlighting the importance of the specificity and typicity of criminal laws.

Bianucci Law Firm
Driving under the influence and evidentiary burdens: judgment no. 26281 of 2024

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 26281 of 2024 that clarifies the burden of proof in cases of driving under the influence, highlighting the role of the public prosecutor and the defendant in challenging the effectiveness of the breathalyzer.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 30042 of 2024: the particular triviality of the act in criminal law.

Let's explore the recent ruling no. 30042 of 2024, which clarifies the criteria for assessing the severity of the offense and the applicability of the non-punishability clause for the particular triviality of the act. A useful analysis for understanding the legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26805 of 2024: Nullity and Jurisdiction of Honorary Justices of the Peace in the Court of Review.

Analysis of ruling no. 26805 of 2024 on the nullity of orders issued by honorary justices of the peace in the context of the review court, highlighting the legal and regulatory implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26285 of 2024: Driving Without a License and Recidivism

Analysis of ruling no. 26285 of 2024 on driving without a license aggravated by recidivism, with a focus on punitive and regulatory implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26798 of 2024: Implicit Challenge of Aggravating Circumstances.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the implicit challenge to aggravating circumstances, particularly in the crime of theft, highlighting the need for a precise formulation of the charges.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26294 of 2024: Prescription and Orlando Reform

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 26294 of 2024, which clarifies the applicability of the statute of limitations for offenses committed between August 3, 2017, and December 31, 2019, highlighting the differences with subsequent reforms.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Ruling No. 26557 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Conditional Suspension of the Sentence

The recent ruling no. 26557 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Naples clarifies the limits of substitute penalties in relation to conditional suspension of the sentence, highlighting the principle of non-retroactivity of less favorable provisions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26952 of 2024: Compensation for Wrongful Detention

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the reimbursement of legal fees in favor of the Ministry of Economy and Finance in cases of compensation for wrongful detention, highlighting the importance of the defense activity in the legitimacy judgment.