Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 26164 of 2024: Sale of Real Estate and Fraudulent Bankruptcy

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the implications of a real estate sale at a price lower than market value in the case of fraudulent bankruptcy. A thorough analysis of the regulations and legal consequences.

Bianucci Law Firm
Asset Infidelity: Commentary on Judgment No. 26415 of 2024

Let's analyze ruling no. 26415/2024, which clarifies the boundaries of asset infidelity and the responsibilities of directors in cases of conflict of interest, illustrating the financial and legal consequences for the companies involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26418 of 2024: Innovations in the Prosecution of Crimes

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the admissibility of the appeal for lack of complaint in relation to offenses that have become prosecutable by complaint, in light of the legislative changes introduced by Legislative Decree No. 150 of 2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
The crime of unlawful influence on the assembly: analysis of ruling no. 26135 of 2024.

Judgment No. 26135 of 2024 clarifies the boundaries of the crime of unlawful influence on the assembly, highlighting the importance of the actual conduct of the assemblies and the effective alteration of majorities. An in-depth analysis of the legal principles involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 27466 of 2024: The Withdrawal of the Complaint in Civil Proceedings Does Not Apply to Criminal Proceedings.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the importance of the distinction between the withdrawal of a complaint in civil and criminal matters, emphasizing that the commitment to withdraw the complaint in civil proceedings has no value in the criminal process.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 29625 of 2024 and the Assembly of Products with Counterfeit Trademark.

Let's analyze ruling no. 29625 of 2024, which clarifies the criminal offense related to the assembly of parts of products with counterfeit trademarks, highlighting the differences with the crime of introducing counterfeit products.

Bianucci Law Firm
Conditional suspension of the sentence: analysis of ruling no. 29643 of 2024.

Judgment No. 29643 of 2024 clarifies important aspects regarding the granting of conditional suspension of the sentence, highlighting the irrelevance of the monetary penalty in the calculation for the second granting of the benefit.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 29284 of 2024: The Interest in Appealing in Case of Recidivism

Let's analyze ruling no. 29284 of 2024, which clarifies the defendant's interest in appealing the declaration of recidivism, even in the absence of an increased sentence, highlighting the implications for prison benefits and rehabilitation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 27688 of 2024: Specific Intent and Participation in Fraudulent Bankruptcy.

Analysis of ruling no. 27688 of 2024, which explores criminal liability in cases of failure to maintain accounting records, highlighting the role of specific intent and complicity in the offense.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 27509 of 2024: The Importance of Validation in Wiretaps.

Let's analyze ruling no. 27509 of 2024, which clarifies the healing effect of judicial validation in the case of interceptions, highlighting the reasoning and legal implications for evidence.