Judgment No. 49480 of October 31, 2023, issued by the Court of Cassation, represents an important ruling regarding the defender's standing in cassation appeals. This decision is crucial for understanding how and when a defender can act in the name and on behalf of the accused, particularly in the context of waiving an appeal.
The case in question concerns E. E., who was in a situation of appealing a decision by the Court of Liberty of Naples. The Court rejected the waiver of the cassation appeal filed by the defender, who was not equipped with a special power of attorney. The Court clarified that a waiver, not constituting an exercise of the right to defense, requires a clear and unequivocal manifestation of the interested party's will, whether expressed personally or through a special representative.
To the cassation appeal - Standing of the defender not equipped with a special power of attorney - Exclusion - Reasons. The act of waiving a cassation appeal, not signed by the accused but only by the defender lacking a special power of attorney, is ineffective, as the waiver, not constituting an exercise of the right to defense, requires the unequivocal manifestation of the interested party's will, expressed personally or through a special representative.
This judgment is part of a well-defined regulatory framework established by the New Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Articles 122 and 589, which govern the modalities for exercising the right to defense and forms of legal representation. The Court, referencing previous case law, reiterated that the defender's representation must be supported by a special power of attorney, without which any act, including a waiver, is ineffective.
Judgment No. 49480 of 2023 offers an important lesson on the value of the right to defense and the necessity of respecting legal procedures to ensure its effectiveness. In a complex legal context such as the Italian one, it is fundamental that all parties involved in the proceedings are aware of the rules governing their standing and the modalities for exercising their rights. The protection of the accused's rights cannot be separated from a correct interpretation and application of current norms, and the Court of Cassation's judgment represents a significant step in this direction.