In recent years, Italian jurisprudence has addressed several issues concerning tax litigation and bankruptcy. Ruling No. 11351 of April 29, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers an important reflection on how tax triggers can affect the rights of a declared bankrupt taxpayer. In particular, this decision clarifies that a bankrupt individual has the standing to challenge tax assessments even after being declared bankrupt, provided that the tax triggers arose subsequently.
The issue addressed by the Court concerns a case where the taxpayer, after being declared bankrupt, continued to conduct their own business activities. The Court ruled that, despite the insolvency situation, the taxpayer retains standing to contest tax assessments issued against them.
In general. In tax litigation, in the case of a tax relationship whose triggers arose after the declaration of bankruptcy, based on the assumption that the declared bankrupt taxpayer continued to conduct their own business activities, the latter has standing to challenge the tax assessment.
This headnote highlights two crucial aspects: the formation of tax triggers and the continuation of business activity. Indeed, the Court recognizes that bankruptcy does not automatically terminate a taxpayer's rights. On the contrary, if the taxpayer has continued to carry on an activity, they have the right to contest any tax assessments notified to them.
Furthermore, the reference to regulations such as Royal Decree No. 267 of 1942, particularly Articles 42, 43, 44, and 46, underscores the importance of considering the legal position of a bankrupt individual, also in relation to taxes. This aspect integrates with the protection of the taxpayer's fundamental rights, as provided for by the Italian legal system and European regulations, which place strong emphasis on the protection of defense rights and fairness in tax treatment.
In conclusion, Ruling No. 11351 of 2024 represents a significant step forward in protecting taxpayer rights in situations of insolvency. It reaffirms that a declaration of bankruptcy does not automatically imply the loss of standing to challenge tax assessments, provided that the tax triggers arose after the declaration. This decision provides an important precedent for legal professionals and taxpayers, reiterating the importance of a legal interpretation that values individual rights even in complex contexts such as bankruptcy.