The recent Order No. 10294 of April 16, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers an important opportunity for reflection on the regulation of notifications of tax documents addressed to legal entities. The ruling, presided over by E. M., with A. S. as rapporteur, focuses on the necessity of respecting specific requirements in the notification procedure, particularly concerning the legal representatives of companies.
The Court established that, regarding the notification of a tax document to a legal entity, it is essential that the notified document contains the indication of the entity's capacity and topographical references. This is achieved through the application of Article 145, paragraph 1, second period, of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the methods of notifying documents to legal entities. The ruling clarifies that only the notified document is relevant, excluding the notification report.
In general. In matters of notification to a legal entity of a tax document, carried out, pursuant to Articles 138, 139, and 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure or via postal service, to the legal representative thereof in application of Article 145, paragraph 1, second period, of the Code of Civil Procedure, only the document being notified is relevant for the indication of the entity's capacity and topographical references, not its notification report.
This order has several practical implications for legal professionals and companies. Among the most relevant, we can cite:
Ultimately, Order No. 10294 of 2024 represents an important step forward in clarifying notification procedures for legal entities. It underscores the importance of correctly fulfilling notification formalities, thereby ensuring respect for the right to defense and the transparency of proceedings. For lawyers and companies, it is crucial to pay attention to these details, as they can significantly influence the outcome of tax disputes. Knowing and correctly applying the rules on notification can make the difference in litigation.