The recent order No. 22114 of August 5, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, offers significant food for thought on tax litigation, particularly concerning excise duties. This ruling analyzes the taxpayer's right to appeal a payment notice already suspended by the administration, highlighting the interest in acting even in the presence of subsequently adopted amending or confirmatory acts. This in-depth analysis is particularly useful for legal professionals and taxpayers facing similar situations.
The issue raised by the ruling concerns Article 14 of Legislative Decree No. 504 of 1995, which governs excise duties, and Article 2-quater of Law Decree No. 564 of 1994, which provides for the suspension of payment notices. The Court emphasizes that the interest in appealing does not cease if the challenged act has already been suspended by the administration. This aspect is crucial, as it guarantees the taxpayer the possibility to protect their rights without having to wait for the conclusion of an administrative procedure.
Excise Duties - Notice pursuant to Article 14 of Legislative Decree No. 504 of 1995 - Suspension pursuant to Article 2-quater, paragraph 1-bis, of Law Decree No. 564 of 1994 - Immediate appeal of the suspended act - Interest in acting - Existence. In matters of excise duties, the right, recognized to the taxpayer by Article 2-quater, paragraph 1-quinquies, of Law Decree No. 564 of 1994, converted by Law No. 656 of 1994, to appeal the payment notice (provided for by Article 14, paragraph 1, of Legislative Decree No. 504 of 1995, as amended by Article 1, letter q), of Legislative Decree No. 48 of 2010, applicable ratione temporis) already suspended by the administration, pursuant to paragraph 1-bis of the aforementioned Article 2-quater, together with the amending or confirmatory act subsequently adopted by the administration, does not in itself exclude the interest in immediately appealing the suspended act.
This headnote highlights how the taxpayer can exercise their right to defense, even in situations where the challenged act is already in the suspension phase. This is a principle of fundamental importance, which protects the taxpayer's interest and promotes greater legal certainty.
The implications of this ruling extend beyond the specific case, offering important clarification on the taxpayer's right to defend themselves effectively and promptly.
In conclusion, order No. 22114 of 2024 represents a significant step in protecting taxpayers' rights concerning excise duties. The Court of Cassation, by recognizing the possibility of immediate appeal in the presence of suspended payment notices, strengthens the taxpayer's position and promotes greater fairness in the tax system. It is essential that legal professionals and taxpayers themselves are aware of these dynamics to best defend their rights.