Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 14873 of 2024: Substitute Sanctions and Judge's Motivation

Analysis of ruling no. 14873 of 2024 clarifying the obligation to provide reasoning in determining the daily value of substitute monetary penalties compared to short-term custodial sentences.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 14882 of 2024: The Digital Signature of the Defender and Its Legal Value.

The recent ruling no. 14882 of 2024 clarifies the importance of the digital signature of the defense lawyer in relation to electronically filed motions, highlighting its authentication value and the practical consequences of this provision in criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Unacceptability of the appeal: ruling no. 15672 of 2024 and the new rules on electronic filing.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Campobasso clarifies the consequences of the lack of digital signature in appeals, highlighting the challenges of the transitional regime established by Legislative Decree No. 150 of 2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15673 of 2024: The Role of the Third Party in Preventive Seizure.

Judgment No. 15673 of 2024 provides important insights on the right of a third-party titleholder to contest a preventive seizure, clarifying the necessary conditions for the validity of confiscation and the role of the fictitious nature of the title.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15655 of 2024: Standing to File a Complaint for the Seizure of Garnished Assets.

Let's explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the parties entitled to file a complaint for the crime of removal of seized assets, analyzing the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16080 of 2024: Nullity of the Paper Judgment in Pandemic Time.

The recent ruling no. 16080 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the implications of the request for an oral hearing during criminal proceedings held in a chamber format during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighting the absolute nullity in the absence of the defense attorney.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17445 of 2024: Ineffectiveness of Seizure and Obligation of Return.

Judgment No. 17445 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the consequences of the expiration of the term in the appeal against confiscation, establishing the ineffectiveness of the measure and the obligation to return the assets in case of exceeding the deadlines set by law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16979 of 2024: Covid-19 Contributions and Undue Perception.

The ruling no. 16979 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the configuration of the crime of fraudulent receipt of public funds in relation to the economic contributions provided by the Italian State during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16955 of 2024: The Crime of Theft and Embezzlement in Public Service.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that distinguishes between theft and embezzlement, clarifying the boundaries of public officials' responsibilities in their actions. An emblematic case provides important points for reflection.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 15389 of 2024: Conditional Suspension of the Sentence and Correction of Errors

Judgment No. 15389 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the correction of material errors regarding conditional suspension of the sentence and provides useful insights for a proper interpretation of the regulations in criminal matters.