Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 50320 of 2023: Precautionary Appeals and the Judge's Reasoning.

Let's explore ruling no. 50320 of 2023 concerning the order rejecting the request for the lifting of the seizure and the implications of the reasoning on 'periculum in mora'.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 51557 of 2023: Substitute Penalties and Cartabia Reform

Judgment No. 51557 of 2023 provides important clarifications on alternative penalties to short prison sentences, in light of the Cartabia reform, highlighting the rights of the convicted and the applicable procedures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 50324 of 30/11/2023: Validation of the Evidence Seizure.

In this analysis of ruling no. 50324 of 30/11/2023, we delve into the implications of the validation order of the evidential seizure and the requirements needed for its legitimacy, highlighting the importance of the 'per relationem' reasoning.

Bianucci Law Firm
Comment on Judgment No. 51573 of 2023: House Arrests and Limits Imposed by the Judge.

Analysis of judgment no. 51573 of 2023 concerning the legitimacy of the limits imposed by the judge on house arrest, highlighting the nullity in the absence of a request from the public prosecutor.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of ruling no. 50304 of 2023: Seizure and rights of third parties.

The ruling of November 10, 2023 clarifies the rights of a third party in the event of confiscation, analyzing the methods of filing an execution incident and the related limitations. Let us explore the details and legal implications of this important pronouncement together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 49739 of 2023 on the Inadmissibility of the Preventive Seizure Appeal.

The very recent ruling of the Court of Cassation offers significant insights into the management of appeals regarding preventive seizure, clarifying the conditions for admissibility and the necessary reasoning requirements.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 49940 of 2023: Extortion and Balancing of Circumstances

An analysis of the recent Judgment No. 49940 of 2023, which clarifies the referral to aggravating circumstances in the crime of extortion and the balancing of circumstances, providing insights for legal practice.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 51324 of 2023: The Mafia Method and the Silent Intimidation Message.

The recent ruling of the Catanzaro Court provides important clarifications on the configurability of the aggravating factor of using the mafia method in cases of silent intimidating messages, highlighting the intimidating capacity of criminal organizations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 49704 of 2023: Premeditation and Contract to Kill in the Mafia Association.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding premeditation in the context of a murder linked to a mafia contract, clarifying the legal and jurisprudential implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Attempted extortion against relatives: commentary on judgment no. 49651 of 2023.

Judgment No. 49651 of 2023 provides important clarifications on the prosecutability of complaints in cases of attempted extortion among relatives, highlighting the role of violence against property and its legal implications.