Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 27748 of 2024: Competition between Receiving Stolen Goods and Possession of Counterfeit Distinctive Signs.

Analysis of ruling no. 27748 of 2024 that clarifies the concurrence between the crime of receiving stolen goods and the possession of counterfeit distinguishing marks, analyzing the cases and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 28049 of 2024: Exemption from Punishment and Cohabitation More Uxorio.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Trieste clarifies the applicability of the exemption provided for in Article 649 of the Criminal Code to a cohabitant in a de facto union, confirming important legal principles regarding crimes against property.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 28050 of 2024: Clarity in the Request for Interrogation during Preliminary Investigations

Discover how the recent ruling no. 28050 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for requesting interrogation during preliminary investigations, emphasizing the importance of clarity and the absence of sacramental formulas.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 27813 of 2024: the Importance of Proper Procedure in Genetic Investigations

This ruling highlights how the violation of international protocols in DNA analysis can compromise the entire criminal process, rendering the results unusable as evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26507 of 2024: Arbitrary Exercise of One's Rights

The ruling no. 26507 of 2024 offers interesting insights on the crime of exercising one's rights arbitrarily and its relationship with the crime of damage. Let us analyze the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 28558 of 2024: Extinction of the Crime and Legal Costs

Let's analyze ruling no. 28558 of 2024, which clarifies the relationship between the extinction of the crime and the order to pay costs in favor of the civil party, highlighting the requirements set by current legislation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 28583 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal due to Abnormality.

Let’s analyze Ordinance No. 28583 of 2024, which clarifies the inadmissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation in the case of dismissal by the investigating judge, highlighting the requirements of abnormality and the 'de plano' procedures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 29379 of 2024: Social Danger and Special Surveillance

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 29379 of 2024 that addresses the issue of social dangerousness and preventive measures, highlighting the legislative choices underlying the Court's decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 25943 of 2024: The Enforcement Incident and the Validity of the Absentee Decree.

An analysis of ruling no. 25943 of 2024 that clarifies the conditions for challenging the validity of the decree of fugitive status in an enforcement incident, highlighting the importance of proper notification and the formation of the executive title.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26588 of 2024: The Postponement of Sentence Execution for Serious Illness.

Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 26588 of 2024, which addresses the delicate issue of the deferral of sentence execution due to serious illness, highlighting the assessment criteria adopted by the judge and their impact on human dignity.