Bianucci Law Firm
Sexual Violence and Dissent: Commentary on Judgment No. 29356 of 2024.

The ruling reaffirms the importance of explicit consent in sexual violence, clarifying that initial dissent cannot be overridden by subsequent opposing behaviors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Crime of improper set-off: analysis of ruling no. 30092 of 2024.

The ruling no. 30092 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for the offense of improper offsetting, establishing the threshold for punishability and the calculation methods.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 30645 of 2024: Limits on the Acquisition of Investigation Documents in Court Proceedings.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Brescia clarifies the limits on the acquisition of investigative documents, highlighting the importance of the consent of all parties involved in the criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Sentence No. 29366 of 2024: Obligation to Articulate Reasons in Review

The ruling of the Court of Naples clarifies the obligation for the party requesting the review to articulate specific reasons, with important consequences in the event of an appeal to the Court of Cassation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment no. 31121 of 14/05/2024: Defensive Investigations and Denial of Access to Places.

Analysis of judgment no. 31121 of 2024 regarding the rejection of requests for access to private places in the context of preventive defensive investigations, with particular attention to current legislation and case law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Tax crimes and preventive seizure: commentary on ruling no. 28709 of 2024.

We explore the recent ruling no. 28709 of 2024 that clarifies the issue of preventive seizure in relation to tax offenses and the grounds for non-punishment provided by decree law no. 34 of 2023.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 29083 of 14/05/2024: The Issue of Non-Punishability

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the issue of non-punishability and prescription, clarifying the rights of the parties involved in the criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 29723 of 2024: the prohibition of the prevalence of generic mitigating factors over repeated recidivism.

Analysis of ruling no. 29723 of 2024 concerning the prohibition of the prevalence of generic mitigating circumstances over repeated recidivism, highlighting the constitutional implications and the balancing of penal provisions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 30372 of 2024: Real Precautionary Appeals and Notification to the Undetained Suspect

Analysis of ruling no. 30372 of May 28, 2024, which clarifies the methods of notification of the notice of hearing scheduling for the non-detained defendant in the context of real precautionary appeals.

Bianucci Law Firm
Effects of the declaration of territorial incompetence: commentary on ruling no. 30666 of 2024.

Analysis of ruling no. 30666 of 2024, which clarifies the effects of the declaration of lack of jurisdiction for territory in the context of real precautionary appeals, with particular reference to the position of co-defendants.