Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 25

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php:25) in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 51
Criminal, Family Law Blog - Bianucci Law Firm
Bianucci Law Firm
Comment on Judgment No. 14840 of 2022: Liability of Entities and Probation.

Let's analyze the ruling no. 14840 of 2022 by the Court of Cassation regarding the regulation of the liability of entities under law no. 231 of 2001, delving into the exclusion of probation for legal persons.

Bianucci Law Firm
The doubling of penalties in financial intermediation: commentary on ruling no. 17615 of 2023.

Analysis of ruling no. 17615 of 2023 regarding the abusive exercise of financial intermediation activities, with a focus on the implications of the regulatory reformulation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 36570 of 2024: Public Hearing Procedures and Preventive Measures

The ruling no. 36570 of 2024 clarifies the consequences of the failure to conduct the procedure in a public hearing regarding personal preventive measures, excluding nullity. Learn more about this important legal issue.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 36573 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Start Date.

Analysis of ruling no. 36573 of 2024 regarding the start date of the asset prevention proceedings, with particular reference to the death of the interested party.

Bianucci Law Firm
Impediment of the defender: analysis of ruling no. 38270/2024

The ruling of the Court of Appeal L'Aquila clarifies the procedures for postponing the hearing in case of the defender's impediment in the appeal trial. An important reflection on legal procedures and the rights of defendants.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 39546 of 2024: Embezzlement and Public Interest

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of the crime of misuse of public funds by public officials, highlighting the distinction between public and private interest.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 37350 of 2024: Importation of Drugs and Requirements for the Commission of the Offense.

Analysis of ruling no. 37350 of 2024 clarifying the requirements for the completion of the crime of importing narcotic substances, highlighting the importance of the material availability of the substance and the control of transfer operations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 38600 of 2024: the meaning of the qualification of public service officer.

Ruling no. 38600 of 2024 clarifies the criteria for the qualification of public service appointee, excluding public employees who perform only executive tasks. A thorough analysis of the decision and its legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 38605 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of judgment no. 38605 of 2024 regarding extradition, highlighting the importance of assessing the grounds for refusal under Article 714, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39680 of 2024: Preventive Seizures and Protection of Third Creditors.

Analysis of the recent ruling No. 39680 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of verifying third-party claims in relation to preventive seizures, in light of legislative changes and the principle of good faith.