Judgment No. 21426 of March 15, 2023, represents a significant intervention by the Court of Cassation concerning recidivism and increased penalties. In this case, the Court partially annulled the decision of the Court of Appeal of Palermo, highlighting the illegality of the sanction increase that exceeds the limits established by the Criminal Code.
The Court clarified that the increase in penalty for recidivism cannot exceed the aggregate of penalties arising from previous convictions, as established by Article 99, paragraph 6, of the Criminal Code. This means that there is an absolute and non-derogable limit to the sanction that can be imposed in practice. This principle is essential to ensure fair and proportionate legal treatment of defendants with prior convictions.
Recidivism - Increased penalty - Exceeding the maximum limit provided by Article 99, sixth paragraph, of the Criminal Code - Illegality of the penalty - Existence. An increased sanction for recidivism, exceeding the aggregate of penalties arising from previous convictions, constitutes an illegal penalty, as the provision of Article 99, sixth paragraph, of the Criminal Code sets an absolute and non-derogable limit to the sanction that can be imposed in practice.
This judgment has significant repercussions on the Italian criminal justice system, as it emphasizes the need to respect the fundamental rights of defendants, particularly regarding the proportionality of penalties. European regulations, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, require penalties to be appropriate and not excessive, which is reflected in the principle of legality of penalties.
In conclusion, Judgment No. 21426 of 2023 reaffirms the importance of the principles of legality and proportionality in Italian criminal law. It signals a step forward towards a fairer justice system, where defendants' rights are respected and applied sanctions conform to the law. It is crucial for legal practitioners to consider these principles to ensure a just and balanced legal system.