Citizen's Income and Online Winnings: The Cassation Court's Ruling 32172/2025 on Gross Calculation

The Italian welfare system relies on the accuracy of self-declarations for access to benefits like the Citizen's Income (RdC). Omissions or falsehoods carry serious legal consequences. The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 32172 (September 29, 2025), has clarified the obligation to declare winnings from online gaming.

The Regulatory Framework: RdC and Ideological Falsehood

The Citizen's Income (Decree-Law no. 4/2019, converted by Law no. 26/2019) is a measure to combat poverty. Access requires a Single Substitute Declaration (DSU) attesting to income and asset requirements. Article 7, paragraph 1, of Decree-Law no. 4/2019 penalizes those who provide untrue data or fail to communicate changes, constituting ideological falsehood. The Cassation Court intervened to define the obligation to declare online gaming winnings and the calculation criterion, even for amounts re-wagered or lost. The ruling, which involved the defendant D. R. F., provided a clear answer.

The Cassation Court's Maxim: Winnings Always Gross

The Supreme Court, with ruling 32172/2025, has unequivocally stated:

The crime provided for by art. 7, paragraph 1, of decree-law of January 28, 2019, no. 4, converted, with amendments, by law of March 28, 2019, no. 26, is constituted by the omission, in the self-declaration for the recognition of the state subsidy of the citizen's income, of sums deriving from "online" gaming winnings, which must be calculated gross and not net of those re-wagered or used to offset previous losses, given that the crediting of the relevant amounts to the winner's account constitutes, "ex se," the acquisition of an economic benefit, without the need for material withdrawal of the corresponding funds.

This maxim is fundamental. The omission to declare online winnings constitutes a crime under Article 7 of Decree-Law no. 4/2019. The calculation is "gross": it is not possible to deduct re-wagered amounts or losses. The crediting of the winnings to the account represents an "acquired economic benefit," altering the income situation for the RdC. Material withdrawal is not necessary: mere availability in the account is sufficient for the declaration obligation.

Practical Implications and Advice

The Cassation Court's decision mandates maximum transparency in declarations for state subsidies. For beneficiaries of the Citizen's Income, here are the key points:

  • Complete Declaration: All income, including online winnings, must be declared.
  • Gross Calculation: Winnings are considered for their total amount, without deductions.
  • Relevance of Availability: Crediting to the account is sufficient, without withdrawal.
  • Criminal Risk: Omission is a criminal offense.

This interpretation aims to prevent abuse and ensure that the RdC is allocated to those who genuinely need it, based on a transparent economic situation.

Conclusions

The Cassation Court's ruling no. 32172/2025 is a clear warning to recipients of the Citizen's Income. The accuracy of information is crucial. Online gaming winnings, even if reinvested, must be declared "gross." The law does not tolerate carelessness; omission constitutes a crime with serious consequences. It is essential to seek professional advice to clarify doubts and ensure that declarations comply with current regulations, avoiding unpleasant legal repercussions.

Bianucci Law Firm