The recent Judgment No. 14074 of March 5, 2024, by the Court of Cassation offers significant food for thought regarding the issue of victim's contributory negligence in criminal matters. This ruling, which rejects the defendant's appeal due to lack of interest, invites us to explore the legal principles governing this delicate subject and its implications in civil and criminal proceedings.
The case involved the defendant R. C., who contested the decision of the Court of Appeal of Messina, which had failed to ascertain the victim's contributory negligence in the causal determination of the event. The Court of Cassation, however, clarified that such an assessment is not necessary in criminal proceedings for the purpose of an appeal.
Judgment ascertaining victim's contributory negligence in the causal determination of the event - Defendant's cassation appeal - Admissibility - Exclusion - Reasons. A cassation appeal by the defendant alleging the trial court's failure to ascertain the victim's contributory negligence in causing the event is inadmissible due to lack of interest, as such an assessment does not have res judicata effect in any potential civil proceedings for restitution and damages. (In its reasoning, the Court clarified that in civil proceedings initiated for this purpose, the res judicata effect of the criminal conviction pertains, pursuant to art. 651 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, solely to the convicted party's conduct and not to that of the victim, even if the victim has joined as a civil party).
This summary highlights the distinction between criminal and civil liability. Indeed, in the context of damages, civil proceedings will be influenced exclusively by the defendant's conduct, without considering any potential liability of the victim. This separation is crucial for understanding how liability is structured in the legal field.
Judgment No. 14074 of 2024 represents an important reference point for Italian jurisprudence, clarifying how the issue of victim's contributory negligence cannot influence appeals in criminal proceedings. These principles not only aim to protect legal certainty but also to ensure the proper administration of justice, preventing the debate on responsibilities from undermining criminal proceedings. Therefore, it is essential for lawyers and legal professionals to understand these dynamics to better assist their clients in the various stages of litigation.