The recent judgment No. 8688 of April 2, 2024, issued by the Court of Appeal of Catania, offers important clarifications on the admissibility of the plaintiff filing additional claims within the context of a plea of falsity. This decision aligns with Article 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the methods for filing claims in civil proceedings.
A plea of falsity is a procedural tool that allows for the challenging of the veracity of a document, deemed false, used during litigation. Its primary objective is to protect material truth and prevent injustices arising from the use of non-authentic documents. Article 104 of the c.p.c. establishes that, in litigation where a plea of falsity is filed, the plaintiff may formulate additional claims against the same defendant.
Plea of falsity as a principal claim - Filing of other claims in the same litigation - Article 104 of the c.p.c. - Admissibility. In litigation where a plea of falsity is filed as a principal claim, the plaintiff's filing of additional claims against the same defendant is admissible, pursuant to Article 104 of the c.p.c.
The Court of Appeal, presided over by Judge G. Travaglino and reported by Judge C. Graziosi, confirmed the admissibility of filing additional claims in litigation where a plea of falsity is presented. This aspect is of particular relevance, as it offers the plaintiff the opportunity to broaden their defense and assert further claims, even in a context as complex as that of a plea of falsity.
Judgment No. 8688 of 2024 represents a significant step towards greater legal certainty in matters of pleas of falsity. The ability to file additional claims allows for a more comprehensive and structured approach to litigation, ensuring adequate protection of the rights of the parties involved. This approach not only respects regulatory provisions but also promotes more efficient management of civil proceedings.