In Italian law, a mortgage contract entered into with a credit institution represents a joint and several obligation. This means that the bank has the right to demand full payment of installments from each of the co-borrowers, regardless of their personal or marital circumstances. When a judge approves a separation agreement in which one spouse undertakes to pay the entire mortgage, this pact is only internally valid between the parties. The credit institution, not being a party to this agreement, maintains its original guarantees unchanged and continues to consider both ex-spouses as debtors in all respects. Therefore, if the spouse who has taken over the mortgage stops paying, the bank will take legal action against the other as well, who will risk being reported to credit bureaus and facing foreclosure.
The legal instrument used to transfer the mortgage payment obligation to only one of the spouses is called "accollo" (assumption). In separation cases, we almost always see an internal assumption, which for the bank is a cumulative assumption. In this scenario, the departing spouse is added to the one remaining in the house but is not released from the original debt. For a liberatory assumption to occur, the explicit consent of the credit institution is essential. The bank will carefully assess the income and asset capacity of the individual spouse who intends to assume the entire debt. If it believes that the guarantees offered by a single person are not sufficient to cover the risk of default, it will refuse to release the ex-spouse, keeping both jointly and severally liable for the entire duration of the loan.
Dealing with the bank's refusal requires a targeted legal strategy and a deep understanding of negotiation dynamics with credit institutions. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, a divorce lawyer in Milan, is based on a rigorous analysis of the spouses' financial situation and the mortgage contract terms. The Bianucci Law Firm does not limit itself to drafting separation agreements but assists the client in the complex phase of communication with the bank. The goal is to build a solid proposal, which may include presenting new guarantees, the intervention of third-party guarantors, or renegotiating loan conditions, to encourage the credit institution to grant the release of the departing spouse.
Every family and financial situation has unique characteristics that require tailored solutions. Avv. Marco Bianucci pays great attention to listening to the client, to fully understand their needs and fears related to debt exposure. Through transparent and constant dialogue, the firm develops alternative paths in cases where liberatory assumption proves unfeasible, such as selling the property to third parties with simultaneous mortgage extinction, or entering into private agreements to protect the spouse who is not released. The priority is always to protect the client's assets and ensure they have the necessary peace of mind to rebuild their future after separation.
If the mortgage is joint and the bank has not granted release, the credit institution has the right to demand payment of overdue installments from both ex-spouses. Even if the separation agreement states that payment is exclusively the responsibility of your ex-spouse, the bank can take action against you, reporting you as a bad payer and possibly proceeding with the seizure of your assets or salary. Subsequently, you will have the right to seek recourse against your ex-spouse to recover what you have paid, but you will need to initiate a separate legal action.
No, the bank has no legal obligation to accept a liberatory assumption, not even in the presence of a separation or divorce decree. The credit institution evaluates the operation solely based on the creditworthiness of the spouse who intends to assume the entire debt. If the latter's income is not deemed sufficient to guarantee repayment of the installments, the bank will keep both spouses liable for payment to protect its credit.
If the bank refuses a liberatory assumption, it is essential to adopt internal protective measures between the spouses. Specific clauses can be included in the separation agreements, providing for penalties in case of late payment of installments by the assuming spouse, or requesting personal or real guarantees to protect the spouse who remains liable to the bank. In extreme cases, the safest solution to sever all financial ties remains the sale of the property and the early extinction of the mortgage.
Remaining tied to a mortgage for a home you no longer live in represents a significant financial risk that can compromise your ability to access new credit and plan your future serenely. Addressing this issue requires specific expertise and a comprehensive strategic vision. The costs of legal proceedings and related negotiations depend on numerous factors specific to each individual case, making an accurate preliminary assessment essential.
Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci at the Bianucci Law Firm in Milan to analyze your specific situation. During the initial consultation, the mortgage conditions, separation agreements, and possible strategies to protect your interests with respect to the credit institution and your ex-spouse will be examined, providing a clear and transparent overview of the commitment required to resolve the dispute.