In the digital age, the ease with which one can obtain micro-cameras, recorders, or tracking devices has made the line between curiosity, control, and crime extremely thin. However, the Italian Penal Code is very clear in protecting the inviolability of the home and private life. Being involved in a case of unlawful interference in private life, whether as a victim or as a suspect, requires an immediate understanding of the seriousness of the situation. As a criminal lawyer in Milan, I often observe how actions perceived as trivial or justified by personal suspicions can escalate into complex criminal proceedings.
Article 615-bis of the Penal Code punishes anyone who, by using visual or audio recording instruments, unlawfully obtains news or images relating to private life taking place in private dwellings. The provision not only protects the home in the strict sense but extends protection to any place where a person has the right to exclude others to conduct private activities, including professional offices and, under certain circumstances, the interior of their own car.
The conduct sanctioned by the legislator is primarily divided into two types. The first concerns the act of unlawfully obtaining images or news. It is crucial to understand that the crime occurs the moment the recording takes place, regardless of its subsequent use. The law punishes unauthorized intrusion into another's private sphere carried out by technical means. It is not necessary for the images to be disseminated: simple unauthorized recording within someone else's home, or even one's own if the recording is clandestine and captures moments of intimacy of unsuspecting third parties, can constitute the crime.
The second type, punished with the same penalty, concerns those who reveal or disseminate, through any means of public information, the news or images unlawfully obtained. The penalties provided are imprisonment from six months to four years, demonstrating how seriously the legal system considers this type of violation. It is important to emphasize that the concept of 'private life' is broad and includes any act or situation that the subject intends to shield from others' curiosity. However, jurisprudence has clarified that recording by someone who is legitimately present and participating in the conversation or scene does not constitute a crime, provided that it does not occur in specific contexts of absolute personal intimacy of others.
Dealing with proceedings for unlawful interference requires a meticulous and technical defense strategy. The approach of lawyer Marco Bianucci, an expert criminal lawyer in Milan, always begins with a rigorous analysis of the facts and the context in which the filming or recording took place. Not all hidden recordings are illegal: the dividing line often lies in the location where they occur and the legitimacy of the recorder's presence.
For those who find themselves having to defend themselves against an accusation under art. 615-bis of the Penal Code, Studio Legale Bianucci works to verify the existence of all the constituent elements of the crime. It is analyzed whether the place actually falls within the legal definition of a private dwelling and whether there was consent, even implicit, to the recording. In many cases, legal assistance involves technical consultants to examine the devices used and the nature of the data captured, in order to build a solid defense based on objective evidence.
In cases where the client is the victim of such intrusions, the primary objective becomes the protection of their privacy and obtaining fair compensation. Lawyer Marco Bianucci assists the injured party in drafting detailed complaints and in constituting themselves as a civil party, working to ensure that the invasion suffered is recognized and adequately sanctioned, preventing further dissemination of the unlawfully captured material.
In general, the Court of Cassation has established that recording a conversation between present individuals, without the knowledge of the other interlocutors, does not constitute the crime of unlawful interference if the recorder is physically present and participating in the dialogue. Such a recording is considered a form of documentation of a historical event being witnessed. However, the legality may be compromised if the recording takes place in someone else's private dwelling under specific circumstances that violate domestic privacy.
This is a delicate issue that balances domestic security with workers' privacy. Although cameras can be installed in one's home, clandestine installation aimed at continuous monitoring of the worker may violate both the Workers' Statute and privacy regulations, exposing one to the risk of sanctions and the inadmissibility of the collected evidence. It is always advisable to inform the worker of the presence of video surveillance systems, except in exceptional cases related to well-founded suspicion of serious ongoing crimes.
Jurisprudence tends to consider the installation of a GPS tracker on a spouse's car as a potential violation, but the legal qualification may vary. If the car is parked in a public place, the crime of harassment or stalking might be configured, rather than unlawful interference in private life (which requires a private dwelling). However, if the car is considered an accessory to the domicile or is located in private areas, the risk of falling under art. 615-bis of the Penal Code is concrete.
The dissemination of images or news obtained through unlawful interference is severely punished by the same Article 615-bis of the Penal Code. Even if one was not the perpetrator of the recording, the disclosure of material known to have been unlawfully obtained constitutes a crime. Furthermore, such conduct exposes one to heavy claims for damages in civil proceedings for the violation of the right to image and privacy.
If you fear you are a victim of unlawful surveillance or are under investigation for making unauthorized recordings or captures, it is essential to act promptly to protect your rights. Lawyer Marco Bianucci is available to analyze your case with the utmost confidentiality and professionalism at the office located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26 in Milan. Contact lawyer Marco Bianucci for a preliminary assessment of your legal position.