Avv. Marco Bianucci
Avv. Marco Bianucci

Criminal Lawyer

Receiving an accusation for the crime of refusal or omission of official acts is a moment of profound concern for any public official or person entrusted with public service. The impact of a criminal investigation of this nature is not only personal but directly threatens job stability and professional reputation. As a criminal lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci understands the serious implications arising from such charges and works with extreme dedication to ensure rigorous, analytical, and timely legal protection.

The Regulatory Framework: Article 328 of the Italian Penal Code

The crime of refusal of official acts, governed by Article 328 of the Italian Penal Code, punishes a public official or a person entrusted with public service who unduly refuses an act of their office that, for reasons of justice, public safety, public order, or hygiene and health, must be performed without delay. The norm aims to protect the proper functioning of Public Administration, ensuring that citizens receive prompt and effective responses in the most critical and sensitive sectors of civil life.

The Two Criminal Hypotheses

Criminal legislation provides for two distinct relevant conducts. The first concerns the actual refusal to perform an urgent act, required for the fundamental reasons mentioned above. In this specific scenario, the crime is consummated at the very moment the denial is issued, without the need for further delay. The second hypothesis, on the other hand, penalizes omission: it occurs when the subject, within thirty days of a formal written request from an interested party, fails to perform the act of their office and omits to respond to explain the reasons for the delay.

The Bianucci Law Firm's Approach to Defense

Addressing an accusation related to crimes against Public Administration requires a cross-disciplinary mastery of criminal law and administrative law. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert criminal lawyer in Milan, focuses on a meticulous examination of the historical facts and complex administrative documentation. The defense strategy is tailor-made, first and foremost, verifying with absolute rigor the actual existence of the qualification of public official or person entrusted with public service in the accused at the time of the alleged facts.

Subsequently, strategic attention shifts to the analysis of the requested act. It is of crucial importance to demonstrate whether the act was actually due, whether the legal requirements for urgency were met, and, above all, whether the refusal or delay can be objectively considered undue. Very often, the failure to adopt a measure is justified by clear documentary deficiencies on the part of the applicant, by legitimate superior orders, or by insurmountable operational impossibilities. The firm's objective is to deconstruct the prosecution's case by highlighting, where present, the absolute absence of intent, meaning the lack of conscious will to violate one's institutional duties.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the risks if I am convicted of refusal of official acts?

The criminal consequences vary depending on the hypothesis contested by the prosecution. For the refusal of urgent acts, the penalty provided by the code is imprisonment from six months to two years. For omission extended beyond thirty days, imprisonment can be up to one year or, alternatively, a monetary penalty is applied. These penalties are almost always accompanied by serious disciplinary repercussions, which can culminate in suspension from service or, in more serious cases, dismissal from public employment.

Can a hospital doctor be accused of this crime?

Yes, doctors working within public healthcare facilities or those affiliated with the National Health Service hold the qualification of persons entrusted with public service or public officials in the exercise of their duties. A doctor can be accused of refusal of official acts if, for example, they unjustifiably refuse to provide assistance in the emergency room or fail to issue a mandatory medical report. In these scenarios, the defense focuses deeply on the correct clinical assessment that determined the professional's operational choices.

What does it mean for the refusal to be considered undue?

The concept of the undue nature of the refusal represents the true core of many defense strategies. It means that the denial must not find any valid justification in the legal or factual landscape. If the public official does not perform the act because the citizen's request is incomplete, because the material jurisdiction belongs to a different office, or due to objectively documentable force majeure, the refusal is not undue. Consequently, if this constituent element is absent, the crime does not exist.

How much does it cost to be assisted in a criminal proceeding of this type?

The costs related to a criminal proceeding depend intrinsically on numerous specific factors that characterize the individual case, such as the inherent complexity of the preliminary investigations, the need to appoint expert consultants, and the volume of hearings scheduled by the procedure. Since each legal situation presents unique facets that influence the professional commitment required, it is neither ethically correct nor possible to provide standardized economic estimates a priori. During the initial consultation, Avv. Marco Bianucci will analyze the documentation in detail to provide a clear, transparent, and rigorous overview of the expected financial commitment to structure the best possible defense.

Entrust Your Defense to the Bianucci Law Firm

Being involved in a criminal investigation for crimes against Public Administration is a complex and draining experience that requires solid and reassuring legal guidance. Do not allow an unfounded or improperly contested accusation to irreparably compromise your professional future and personal peace of mind. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci at the Law Firm's Milan office, located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, to schedule a confidential meeting. Through a careful and unbiased analysis of your case, we will jointly evaluate the most appropriate defense strategy to firmly protect your rights and your honor.