In the complex landscape of Italian tax criminal law, the correct legal qualification of illicit conduct is fundamental and can have significant consequences. The Supreme Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 26934, filed on July 23, 2025, has provided essential clarification on the delicate boundary between the crime of false declaration and that of aggravated fraud against the State. This pronouncement is crucial for understanding the application of the principle of specialty in tax criminal matters and its practical implications.
The ruling in question, issued by the Second Criminal Section under the presidency of Dr. A. C. and with Dr. L. A. as rapporteur and speaker, rejected an appeal filed against a decision of the Tribunal of Liberty of Reggio Calabria. The case concerned the correct attribution of criminal liability to a defendant (R. I.) for conduct potentially attributable to both offenses, focusing on the issue of the prevalence of one scenario over the other.
The crime of false declaration, provided for by art. 4 of Legislative Decree of March 10, 2000, no. 74, occurs when a taxpayer, in order to evade taxes, indicates in an annual declaration lower active elements than the actual ones or fictitious passive elements, exceeding certain punishability thresholds. This is a specific tax law offense, focused on the falsity of the declaration.
On the other hand, the crime of aggravated fraud against the State, governed by art. 640, second paragraph, no. 1, of the Criminal Code, is a general crime that punishes anyone who, through artifices or deceptions, inducing someone into error, procures for themselves or others an unjust profit with harm to others. The aggravating circumstance applies when the harm falls upon the public administration. The potential overlap arises from the fact that even a false tax declaration could be considered a