The central issue revolves around the concept of 'more uxorio' cohabitation, meaning a stable and continuous relationship, comparable to a true family unit. According to the consolidated orientation of the Court of Cassation, the establishment of a de facto family by the ex-spouse receiving support leads, in most cases, to its revocation. This occurs because the new stable relationship creates a bond of mutual moral and material assistance that supersedes and replaces the post-marital solidarity arising from the previous marriage. Spousal support, in fact, has a predominantly assistential function, aimed at supporting the economically weaker spouse. With the formation of a new stable life project, this function ceases to exist.
For cohabitation to be considered stable, a simple emotional relationship is not enough. Judges assess the presence of concrete elements indicating a shared project and stability comparable to marriage. Such elements can include cohabitation, shared expenses, mutual assistance, and a shared life project perceivable also externally. It is important to emphasize that the revocation of support is generally definitive: even if the new cohabitation were to end, the right to receive support from the previous marriage is not reinstated, as the choice to create a new family unit is considered a personal decision that severs the financial tie with the past.
Managing these situations requires expertise and a well-defined legal strategy, whether one intends to request the revocation of support or needs to defend against such a request. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert family lawyer in Milan, is based on a rigorous and personalized analysis of the specific case. For the ex-spouse obligated to pay, the path consists of gathering the necessary evidence to unequivocally demonstrate the stability of the beneficiary's new relationship. This may include documentation, testimonies, or, in more complex cases, the assistance of private investigators to ascertain the true nature of the new bond.
On the other hand, for the ex-spouse receiving support and who has entered into a new relationship, the defense focuses on demonstrating that this bond does not possess the requirements of stability and shared project needed by law to justify revocation. In every scenario, the firm's objective is to provide pragmatic legal assistance, aimed at asserting the client's reasons before the judge with solid arguments and concrete evidence. The experience gained allows for a clear assessment of the probability of success and advice on the most effective procedural strategy to achieve the desired outcome.
No, jurisprudence is clear on this point. A simple dating or occasional romantic relationship, even if known to third parties, is not sufficient to cause the revocation of support. The law requires the formation of a true 'de facto family,' characterized by stability, a shared project, and mutual moral and material assistance. It is the creation of a new, stable family unit that breaks the bond of post-marital solidarity.
Proof of stable cohabitation can be provided through various means. Among the most common are civil registry certificates attesting to cohabitation, joint rental or mortgage contracts, shared bills or utilities, testimonies from friends, relatives, or neighbors, and in some cases, photographs or evidence gathered through investigative agencies. The burden of proof lies with the party requesting the revocation of support.
Generally no. According to the prevailing orientation of the Court of Cassation, the choice to enter into stable cohabitation is a personal decision that definitively severs the bond of solidarity with the ex-spouse. Consequently, the end of the new relationship does not revive the right to receive spousal support, which is considered permanently extinguished.
No, child support and spousal support are two completely distinct institutions. Child support is based exclusively on the children's needs for living, upbringing, education, and health, and it is a duty of both parents. A new cohabitation of one of the parents does not directly affect this obligation, except to the extent that it substantially alters the parent's economic capacity, but this would be assessed from a completely different perspective.
Managing the consequences of a new cohabitation on spousal support requires careful and personalized legal analysis. The variables involved are numerous, and an incorrect assessment can have significant financial consequences. If you find yourself in this situation, it is essential to act with awareness and strategy. Avv. Marco Bianucci offers his consolidated experience to analyze your specific position, whether you intend to request the revocation of support or need to defend your right to receive it. Contact the Bianucci Law Firm in Milan for an in-depth evaluation of your case.