Facing a separation or divorce involves not only managing emotional and relational aspects but also a complex economic reorganization. One of the most delicate and technically complex issues that arise in courtrooms concerns the correct assessment of the economic capacity of spouses when one of them holds company shares or is an entrepreneur. In fact, personal income tax returns often do not faithfully reflect real financial availability, especially when there are undistributed profits retained as reserves. As a divorce lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci frequently finds himself analyzing financial statements and corporate structures to ensure that the determination of alimony is fair and based on the substantive reality, not just the formal one.
In the context of separation proceedings, the determination of alimony for a spouse or children is based on the economic disparity between the parties and the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage. However, when one of the spouses is a shareholder in a limited liability company (such as an S.r.l.) or a partnership, a simple reading of the tax return (Modello Unico or 730) may not be sufficient. It is common practice, for various reasons ranging from tax strategy to the need to capitalize the company, for generated profits not to be distributed to shareholders but retained as reserves. From a strictly tax perspective, these amounts do not enter the shareholder's personal income and, consequently, do not appear on their tax return. This mechanism can create a significant distortion in the assessment of real economic capacity, leading to a calculation of alimony that is lower than what would be equitable.
Italian jurisprudence, and in particular the Court of Cassation, has repeatedly clarified that the separation judge must not limit themselves to a superficial analysis of income declared to the tax authorities. On the contrary, it is necessary to investigate the actual financial standing and spending capacity. Undistributed profits, although remaining within the company's assets, can represent an indicator of wealth that the judge has a duty to evaluate, especially if it is demonstrated that the shareholder controls the company and therefore has the power to decide whether and when to distribute such resources. As an expert family law attorney in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci emphasizes the importance of demonstrating whether such retention is due to real business needs or if it constitutes a shield to withdraw resources from post-marital solidarity.
Avv. Marco Bianucci, practicing as a divorce lawyer in Milan, adopts an analytical and rigorous approach in managing cases involving corporate assets. The strategy of the Bianucci Law Firm does not stop at the documentary surface. When assisting the economically weaker spouse, the goal is to reveal the other party's real economic capacity. This is achieved through a detailed examination of the company's financial statements for recent years, verifying not only the operating profit but also the reserve items, cash flows, and any personal expenses charged to company accounts. The experience gained allows for the identification of anomalies or discrepancies between declared income and the actual standard of living, a crucial element for supporting maintenance claims in court.
On the other hand, when the firm assists an entrepreneur or shareholder, the defense focuses on demonstrating the legitimacy and economic necessity of the retentions. Not all undistributed profits are a symptom of tax evasion or concealment: they are often vital for business continuity, future investments, or to cope with periods of market crisis. In these cases, Avv. Marco Bianucci works to highlight how these resources are not immediately available to the client and, therefore, should not be automatically considered for maintenance purposes. Clarity of exposition and the ability to translate complex accounting data into solid legal arguments are fundamental to guiding the judge's decision.
To address these issues with the necessary expertise, the Bianucci Law Firm, when necessary, collaborates with trusted accountants and auditors. This professional synergy allows for the preparation of expert reports that analyze the origin of profits and their allocation. Furthermore, during the proceedings, it is possible to request the judge to carry out tax police investigations through the Guardia di Finanza, if there are well-founded suspicions of asset concealment or a misrepresentation of the economic reality. Avv. Marco Bianucci carefully evaluates the appropriateness of such requests, balancing the evidentiary benefits with the timeline of the proceedings.
No, there is no mathematical automatism. Profits retained as reserves do not constitute immediate income for the shareholder. However, the judge has the discretionary power to evaluate them as an indicator of economic and asset capacity. If it is demonstrated that the retention is an instrumental choice to artificially lower personal income in view of the separation, the judge may take it into account when quantifying alimony, based on actual wealth and not just declared wealth.
Proof requires a thorough analysis of accounting documentation and lifestyle. It is essential to submit the company's financial statements, explanatory notes, and any documents attesting to the company's financial management to the court. Furthermore, evident discrepancies between low personal income and a high standard of living (luxury cars, travel, real estate) can lead the judge to order more in-depth investigations, including tax police inquiries, to verify the spouse's actual de facto availability.
This is a situation that requires particular attention. If the company is incurring losses but the shareholder continues to live comfortably, there may be mixed use of company funds or the existence of undeclared income. As an expert family law attorney, Avv. Marco Bianucci points out that jurisprudence tends to favor the criterion of the actual standard of living. In these cases, bank and asset investigations become essential tools for reconstructing cash flows and demonstrating the party's real economic strength.
The issue is complex and depends on the matrimonial property regime and the nature of the reserves. In general, undistributed profits remain the property of the company and do not immediately fall into community property. However, at the time of the dissolution of the legal community property, a claim for the share of undistributed profits accrued during the marriage may arise, within the scope of the so-called "comunione de residuo" (community of remaining assets). Each case must be analyzed specifically to determine if there are grounds for claiming these sums.
The management of company profits in separation proceedings requires specific expertise that combines family law with accounting analysis. If you are facing a separation and fear that the financial situation has not been correctly represented, or if you are an entrepreneur who needs to protect the continuity of your business while respecting family obligations, it is essential to rely on an experienced professional. The Bianucci Law Firm, located in Milan at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, is at your disposal to examine your situation with confidentiality and professionalism. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci to schedule an initial consultation and define the most suitable strategy for your needs.