The end of a relationship is always an emotionally delicate moment, but when it comes to a de facto couple, the situation can become particularly complex from a legal standpoint as well. Unlike marriage, where rights and duties are rigidly and almost automatically codified, a de facto relationship requires careful analysis of the specific circumstances to ensure adequate protection. Many people turn to the firm asking what guarantees Italian law provides when two people who have shared a life project decide to separate without being married. As a family lawyer practicing in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci deeply understands the confusion that can arise from the perception of a regulatory void and is committed to providing clarity and concrete support during this transitional phase.
In Italy, Law no. 76/2016 (known as the Cirinnà Law) introduced important innovations for de facto couples, distinguishing between simple cohabitants and de facto cohabitants registered with the civil registry. However, substantial differences remain compared to the institution of marriage. In case of separation, the economically weaker cohabitant is not entitled to maintenance payments, unless a specific cohabitation agreement has been drawn up providing for such a measure. Protection, on the other hand, is maximum and equivalent to that of marriage when there are children: in this case, parental responsibility, the right to child support, and custody decisions follow the same rules as for married couples, always placing the paramount interest of the child at the center.
One of the most critical aspects concerns the assignment of the family home. If the couple has no children, the property remains in the exclusive possession of the owner, and the non-owner cohabitant has no right of residence, except for a limited transitional period. The situation changes radically in the presence of minor or non-self-sufficient adult children: in such a scenario, the judge may assign the home to the parent with whom the children primarily reside, even if they are not the owner of the property, to ensure environmental continuity for the children. Regarding assets acquired during cohabitation, without a legal community property regime, each acquisition remains the property of the person who made it, unless proven otherwise or unless different written agreements exist, often making precise documentary reconstruction of family financial flows necessary.
Avv. Marco Bianucci, as an expert family lawyer in Milan, handles separations of de facto couples with a method that prioritizes negotiation and the protection of parental bonds. The firm's strategy is not limited to the mechanical application of the law but involves an in-depth analysis of the couple's history, any economic contributions made by both parties to the family unit, and the presence of tacit or written agreements. The goal is to reach balanced agreements that, where possible, avoid lengthy and painful litigation. In the case of couples with children, Avv. Marco Bianucci's focus is primarily on defining a co-parenting plan that preserves the right to shared parenting, precisely calculating the maintenance payments due based on the Milan Court's tables and the parties' actual earning capacities.
In de facto relationships, unlike marriage, there is no automatic right to maintenance payments for the ex-partner, regardless of economic disparity or the duration of the relationship. The only exception concerns potential alimony, which, however, is an assistance measure due only if the applicant is in need and unable to support themselves. However, if the parties had signed a cohabitation agreement that provided for specific economic protections in case of separation, such agreements are fully valid and binding.
The protection of children is a priority and is independent of the parents' marital status. If children were born from the de facto relationship, the judge may decide to assign the family home to the parent with whom the children primarily reside (custodial parent), even if the property is exclusively owned by the other parent or jointly owned. This measure aims to protect the minors' interest in not suffering trauma from changes to their domestic environment. The right of residence persists until the children become financially self-sufficient or move out.
In the absence of the community property regime, typical of marriage, every asset acquired during cohabitation belongs to the person who bought it. If an asset was purchased jointly, the rules on ordinary co-ownership apply, and each person remains the owner of their share. Disputes often arise regarding expenses incurred by one partner for assets owned by the other (e.g., renovations). In these cases, Avv. Marco Bianucci assesses whether the conditions are met to claim compensation for unjust enrichment, analyzing whether the expenses were proportionate to economic capacity and the spirit of family solidarity.
The timelines are generally shorter than for judicial separation or divorce, as there is no need to wait for the legal terms required for spouses. If the parties reach an agreement on child custody and financial matters, the procedure can be very quick. However, in the presence of minor children, it is always advisable, and often necessary, to ratify the agreement through a court application to obtain a legally enforceable order that protects the rights of the minors over time. Without an agreement, the timelines depend on the duration of ordinary judicial litigation.
Facing the end of a cohabitation requires clarity and a thorough understanding of one's rights, which are often less known than those in marriage. Do not let regulatory uncertainty compromise your future or that of your children. To analyze your specific situation and define the most suitable strategy for your case, contact Studio Legale Bianucci. Avv. Marco Bianucci is available for an initial consultation at the Milan office located at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, where you can jointly evaluate the available options.