The recent judgment No. 20006 of July 19, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, addressed a matter of great importance for medical residents: the economic treatment received during their training period. Specifically, the decision clarified the provisions regarding the adjustment of scholarships for the academic years from 1992-1993 to 2005-2006, stating that these are not subject to annual increases or triennial adjustments.
The judgment is based on a series of legislative provisions, starting with Legislative Decree No. 257 of 1991, which establishes the economic treatment modalities for medical residents. In particular, Article 6, paragraph 1, provides for a triennial adjustment which, however, was temporarily blocked by a series of subsequent regulations, such as Decree-Law No. 384 of 1992 and other laws up to 2002. This block had direct effects on the economic treatment of medical residents, excluding the possibility of adjustments related to inflation and the cost of living.
UNIVERSITIES - IN GENERAL Medical residents - Economic treatment - Academic years from 1992-1993 to 2005-2006 - Triennial adjustment pursuant to art. 6, paragraph 1, legislative decree no. 257 of 1991 - Temporary block - Existence - Basis. The amount of scholarships for medical residents enrolled in specialization courses in the academic years between 1992/1993 and 2005/2006 is not subject to annual increases in relation to changes in the cost of living, nor to triennial adjustments, as provided for by art. 6, paragraph 1, of legislative decree no. 257 of 1991, due to the block on such updates provided, with converging and continuous effects, by art. 7, paragraph 5, decree-law no. 384 of 1992, converted by law no. 438 of 1992, as interpreted by art. 1, paragraph 33, of law no. 549 of 1995; by art. 3, paragraph 36, of law no. 537 of 1993; by art. 1, paragraph 66, of law no. 662 of 1996; by art. 32, paragraph 12, of law no. 449 of 1997; by art. 22 of law no. 488 of 1999; by art. 36 of law no. 289 of 2002.
This judgment has significant repercussions for medical residents, as it clarifies that during the period in question, there were no possibilities for economic increases linked to changes in the cost of living. This means that scholarships remained fixed, without adjustments, creating a situation of economic uncertainty for many young professionals in the healthcare sector.
In conclusion, judgment No. 20006 of 2024 represents an important reference point for the issue of the economic treatment of medical residents. The Court of Cassation has reaffirmed the continuation of the adjustment block, leaving the scholarships unchanged during the period considered. It is crucial that medical residents, and more generally all professionals in the sector, are aware of the implications of this decision, which could influence their long-term economic and professional expectations.