The recent judgment of the Court of Cassation no. 30656 of 2023 has reignited the legal debate on identifying the proceeds of crime in cases of money laundering. This decision, involving Banca Cramer & CIE, offers significant insights for understanding the legal implications for financial institutions and the application of money laundering regulations.
The case in question concerns the appeal filed by Banca Cramer against a preventive seizure order for sums of money considered to be the proceeds of illicit activities, particularly tax fraud and embezzlement. The Court rejected the appeal, emphasizing that the bank had been used as a tool to conceal the illicit origin of the funds.
The money laundering mechanism is not in dispute, as several convictions have already been issued in this regard.
The judgment recalled important legal principles, including the definition of confiscable profit, which must be understood as the sum of economic advantages derived from the illicit act. The Court clarified that, in cases of money laundering, the profit to be confiscated is the entire laundered amount, contrary to the bank's assertion, which sought to limit confiscability to only the net financial gain actually obtained.
This judgment has significant implications for banking institutions, highlighting their responsibility in preventing and combating money laundering. The Court clarified that, by virtue of their function, banks must ensure the traceability and regularity of operations in order to avoid becoming instruments of illicit activities.
Judgment no. 30656 of 2023 represents an important step in the fight against money laundering and embezzlement, reiterating the obligation for financial institutions to supervise and operate in compliance with current regulations. The distinction between gross and net profit, as well as the identification of confiscable profit, are crucial issues that deserve attention and in-depth analysis from all legal and financial sector operators.