When a judge issues a sentence or an order, compliance with that decision is an essential foundation of our legal system. However, it frequently happens that one of the parties involved tries to evade the imposed obligations, potentially constituting the crime provided for by Article 388 of the Criminal Code. Facing a situation where a judicial order is ignored or circumvented can generate frustration and a sense of powerlessness, whether in financial matters or delicate family dynamics. As an expert criminal lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci understands the seriousness of these circumstances and the impact they can have on clients' lives.
Article 388 of the Criminal Code does not punish simple non-compliance but requires specific conduct characterized by intent. The rule penalizes anyone who, to evade the fulfillment of obligations arising from an order of the judicial authority, carries out simulated or fraudulent acts on their own or others' assets. Furthermore, the crime is also constituted in the case of anyone who evades the execution of a civil court order concerning the custody of minors or other incapable persons, or which prescribes precautionary measures for the protection of property, possession, or credit. It is crucial to distinguish between the mere impossibility of complying and the precise intention to evade the judge's order through artifice or trickery, or through unjustified refusal in the case of orders concerning minors.
Handling proceedings for willful non-compliance with an order requires rigorous technical analysis. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert criminal lawyer in Milan, is based on a detailed preliminary assessment of the documents to verify the existence of the constituent elements of the crime. It is not enough for there to be non-compliance: the presence of fraudulent intent or evasive intent must be demonstrated or refuted.
For those who find themselves as the injured party, the firm works to build a strong civil claim, gathering the necessary evidence to demonstrate that the opposing party acted with the specific intention of rendering the court's decision ineffective. Conversely, if the client is accused of this crime, Avv. Marco Bianucci's defense strategy aims to highlight the absence of intent or the lack of fraudulent conduct, demonstrating that any non-compliance is due to force majeure or objective impossibility, and not to the will to defy judicial authority. Deep knowledge of Milanese case law allows the firm to anticipate critical issues in the case and to steer the defense towards the most favorable outcome.
The crime is primarily constituted through two types of conduct. The first concerns the commission of simulated or fraudulent acts on assets (such as fictitious sales or concealment of assets) to avoid fulfilling civil obligations arising from a judgment. The second concerns the evasion of orders concerning the custody of minors or incapacitated persons, which often manifests as a refusal to hand over the minor to the parent with the right to custody or obstruction of visitation rights established by the judge.
Generally no. The mere failure to pay a sum of money, even if established by a judge, does not automatically constitute a crime under art. 388 of the Criminal Code, unless the debtor has committed fraudulent acts to hide their assets and appear to be penniless. However, in the context of family law, the failure to pay maintenance payments can constitute a different crime (art. 570 or 570 bis of the Criminal Code), which requires a separate assessment by an expert criminal lawyer.
If the other parent systematically evades the judge's order regarding visitation times or custody, it is possible to file a complaint for the crime of willful non-compliance with a judicial order. It is essential to document every instance of non-compliance. In these cases, the assistance of Avv. Marco Bianucci is crucial to draft a detailed complaint that highlights the evasive nature of the conduct and not a mere organizational oversight.
Article 388 of the Criminal Code provides for a penalty of imprisonment for up to three years or a fine. The severity of the sanction depends on the gravity of the conduct, the nature of the violated order, and the consequences that the evasion has caused for the injured party. As it is a crime punishable by a complaint from the injured party, it is often possible to find conciliatory solutions before the criminal proceedings reach a verdict, if handled competently.
If you are involved in a dispute concerning the execution of a judgment or an order, it is essential to act quickly and competently. Whether you need to defend yourself from an accusation or protect your rights in the face of another's non-compliance, Avv. Marco Bianucci is available to analyze your case with the utmost professionalism. Contact the firm at via Alberto da Giussano 26 in Milan to schedule a meeting and define the best defense strategy.