Facing the end of a marriage involves not only significant emotional burden but also the need to navigate complex financial matters. One of the most frequent questions I am asked in my office concerns the fate of severance pay (Trattamento di Fine Rapporto - TFR) or supplementary pension schemes in cases where the end of the union is attributed to the fault of one of the spouses. As a divorce lawyer practicing in Milan, I understand how crucial it is to know whether the attribution of blame can definitively compromise the right to receive a share of the ex-partner's severance pay.
The issue is not purely theoretical but has immediate practical implications for planning one's economic future. It is often mistakenly believed that the division of assets follows automatic rules, ignoring how behavior during the marriage and the causes leading to the breakdown can radically influence rights after divorce. It is essential to analyze the situation with clarity to understand if there are grounds to claim or deny such economic entitlement.
To understand whether the spouse to whom the separation was attributed is entitled to a share of the TFR, one must analyze the chain mechanism provided by the Divorce Law (Law 898/1970). Article 12-bis establishes that the divorced spouse is entitled to a percentage of the severance pay received by the other, but it sets an indispensable condition: the claimant must be entitled to divorce alimony. This is the crux of the matter.
The attribution of blame for the separation, i.e., the judicial finding that the marital crisis was caused by the violation of marital duties (such as infidelity or abandonment of the marital home) by one of the spouses, usually results in the loss of the right to maintenance and, subsequently, to divorce alimony. If the judge attributes blame to a spouse, that spouse loses the right to receive periodic alimony (except for the exceptional case of maintenance for a state of need, which however does not equate to divorce alimony). Consequently, if the fundamental prerequisite of divorce alimony is missing, the right to a share of the TFR also automatically lapses. In summary, the spouse "guilty" of the end of the marriage, by losing alimony, also loses their severance pay.
In my role as an expert family law attorney in Milan, I approach each separation and divorce case with a strategy aimed at the comprehensive protection of the client's assets. When discussing the attribution of blame and its economic repercussions, such as TFR, Studio Legale Bianucci's approach is not limited to the mere application of the law but delves deeply into marital dynamics to build a solid case.
If I represent the spouse who risks having blame attributed to them, my goal is to dismantle accusations of violating marital duties or to demonstrate that the marital crisis predated the alleged events, thereby safeguarding the right to alimony and, consequently, to a share of the TFR. Conversely, when I represent the spouse who has suffered the wrong, I work to ensure that the attribution of blame is unequivocally recognized, protecting their severance pay from illegitimate claims. Consultations at our office on Via Alberto da Giussano aim to clarify these scenarios immediately: we analyze whether the attribution of blame is well-founded and preliminarily calculate the resulting economic impact, allowing the client to make informed and strategic decisions.
No, generally that is not sufficient. The attribution of blame leads to the loss of the right to maintenance and divorce alimony. Even if the judge were to recognize alimony for "maintenance" (linked to pure survival), prevailing jurisprudence holds that this does not automatically grant the right to a share of the TFR, which is strictly linked to actual divorce alimony.
The right to the share arises only when the worker (the other spouse) actually receives their severance pay. It is not possible to request an advance of the share if the ex-spouse's employment relationship is still ongoing. An application must be submitted to the Court after the TFR has accrued and become payable.
Subsequent marriage extinguishes all rights. The law provides that, to be entitled to the 40% share of the TFR attributable to the years when the employment relationship coincided with the marriage, the claimant must not have remarried. Cohabitation, however, is a more debated issue, but remarriage is a certain cause for exclusion.
The economic implications of a divorce with attributed blame can be severe and irreversible if not managed with due expertise. Whether you need to defend your right to a share of severance pay or protect your TFR from unfounded claims, it is essential to act with a clear legal strategy from the early stages of separation. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for an in-depth evaluation of your case. I receive by appointment at the office in Milan, Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, to define together the best course of action for your asset protection.