Facing the end of a marriage due to infidelity is a painful experience that combines emotional suffering with the need to clarify one's legal and economic future. When the marital bond breaks due to the violation of the duty of fidelity, the institution of fault-based separation comes into play. As a divorce lawyer operating in Milan, I understand how delicate it is to manage these dynamics, where the search for procedural truth must always be balanced with the protection of privacy and personal dignity. It is crucial to understand that not all infidelity automatically leads to fault-based separation: a precise legal strategy is required to demonstrate the causal link between the infidelity and the marital crisis.
Fault-based separation is not an automatic penalty, but a judicial ruling that ascertains the responsibility of one of the spouses in the end of the marriage. According to established case law, for the judge to pronounce fault-based separation against the unfaithful spouse, it is not sufficient to prove the act of infidelity itself. It is necessary to demonstrate that the infidelity was the triggering cause of the marital crisis and not the consequence of a relationship already irreparably compromised. If, for example, the couple had already been living 'like strangers in a house' for some time, any subsequent extramarital affair might not be considered relevant for the purpose of fault-based separation. This is a crucial point that requires careful analysis of the facts and timelines.
Evidence gathering is a critical phase of the proceedings. Our legal system upholds the principle of freedom of evidence, but this is subject to strict limits in the protection of privacy and the secrecy of correspondence. WhatsApp messages, emails, photographs, and social media posts can constitute valid evidence, provided they have been obtained legitimately and not through unauthorized access to password-protected devices, conduct that could have criminal relevance. Often, to document relationships and behaviors incompatible with marital duties, the assistance of authorized private investigators is sought. Investigative reports, if conducted in compliance with current regulations, can provide a solid evidentiary framework to support the request for fault-based separation.
Obtaining fault-based separation has significant financial implications for the spouse responsible for the breakdown. The main consequence is the loss of the right to spousal support, even if they would have been abstractly entitled to it due to economic disparity, retaining only the right to alimony in the extreme case of need. Furthermore, the spouse to whom the separation is attributed loses inheritance rights with respect to the other spouse. In addition to this, in cases of particular gravity where the infidelity was ostentatious or publicly damaged the partner's dignity and honor, the possibility arises to request compensation for intra-family damages, an additional protection aimed at compensating for the emotional suffering endured.
The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert lawyer in family law in Milan, is distinguished by meticulous preliminary case analysis. We do not limit ourselves to collecting the client's complaints, but we assess the legal sustainability of the request for fault-based separation by examining the marital history as a whole. The firm's strategy aims to build an unassailable evidentiary framework, selecting only evidence that can withstand judicial scrutiny without exposing the client to counter-arguments or legal risks for privacy violations. The goal is to transform a situation of emotional crisis into an orderly legal process, aimed at protecting the client's economic and personal interests, whether it is a matter of requesting fault-based separation or defending against unfounded accusations.
Not always. A single message can be an indication, but by itself it may not be sufficient to prove the existence of a stable extramarital relationship or its causal impact on the marital crisis. Often, a more complex evidentiary framework is needed to demonstrate the violation of marital duties.
Recordings made between present parties without the knowledge of one of them can be used in civil proceedings to assert one's rights, provided that the person recording is part of the conversation and it does not involve environmental interceptions (i.e., recordings made by leaving a device in a room where one is not present), which are instead illegal.
As a rule, in civil proceedings, the principle of being defeated applies, meaning the party that loses the case is ordered to reimburse the legal costs to the winning party. However, the judge has the discretion to offset costs, totally or partially, depending on the complexity of the case and the overall outcome of the judgment.
Generally, no. Fault-based separation concerns the relationship between spouses and does not affect parental capacity. Child custody and placement are decided solely by evaluating the paramount interest of the minor, unless the parent's conduct has been such as to also prejudice the psychological and physical well-being of the offspring.
If you suspect marital infidelity or are facing a complex separation, it is essential to act with clarity and the support of a competent professional. Avv. Marco Bianucci is available to evaluate your specific situation, analyze the evidence you possess, and outline the best strategy to protect your rights. Contact Studio Legale Bianucci at via Alberto da Giussano 26 in Milan to book an appointment and receive a qualified opinion on your case.