When a child decides to pursue university or vocational training in a city different from their family's residence, a delicate phase opens up for parents, not only emotionally but also legally and economically. The question I am often asked as a lawyer specializing in family law in Milan concerns the persistence of the maintenance obligation and the management of new expenses that this choice entails. It is crucial to understand that reaching adulthood, nor the physical relocation of the child to another home for study or work purposes, automatically terminates the financial obligation of the parents.
Our legal system, supported by consolidated case law from the Court of Cassation, establishes that the right to maintenance for an adult child persists until economic independence is achieved, provided that the young person actively engages in their educational path or job search. The condition of being a student living away from home often represents a natural continuation of the duty of instruction and education enshrined in Article 147 of the Civil Code. However, this does not mean that the right is unlimited: it must be assessed in relation to the parents' financial capacity and the reasonableness of the path chosen by the child.
One of the most complex aspects concerns the classification of expenses incurred for a child living elsewhere. Rent, utilities, university fees, and transportation costs must be correctly categorized to avoid conflicts between parents, especially in situations of separation or divorce. As a lawyer specializing in family law, I often notice confusion about what falls under the ordinary maintenance allowance and what should be considered an extraordinary expense.
Generally speaking, if the maintenance allowance was calculated assuming the child lived with one of the parents, moving away from home radically changes the picture of needs. Living and accommodation expenses in the city of study are fixed and predictable costs that, according to the most recent case law, tend to fall under ordinary maintenance or require a specific recalculation of the allowance. Conversely, university fees, master's degrees, or the purchase of specific technical equipment are almost always considered extraordinary expenses, usually to be shared 50% or according to different percentages established in court orders, with the agreement of the parties.
Avv. Marco Bianucci addresses these issues with a pragmatic and forward-thinking approach, aware that preventing conflict is often more advantageous than managing it in court. When assisting a parent during this transitional phase, the goal is to define clear and detailed agreements that reflect the family's new economic reality. We do not limit ourselves to calculating amounts but analyze the child's educational project and the economic sustainability for the client.
In my role as a lawyer specializing in family law in Milan, I always advise formalizing agreements regarding the maintenance of a child living away from home. This includes the clear division of rental costs (often the most significant expense in Milan and major university cities) and the definition of a protocol for extra expenses. The firm's intervention aims to protect the client's assets while ensuring proper support for the child, preventing the maintenance allowance from becoming a parasitic income or, conversely, the obligated parent from evading their duties by exploiting physical distance.
No, simply changing residence or domicile for study purposes does not equate to economic independence. If the child does not have their own sufficient income to guarantee a dignified standard of living, the parents' obligation to provide maintenance continues; indeed, it may even increase due to the higher costs associated with living away from home.
It depends on the current agreements. If the allowance was established when the child lived at home, rent represents a new and unforeseen expense. It is usually considered an extraordinary expense or requires a review of the monthly allowance amount, as it significantly impacts the budget. It is essential to agree on this expense in advance between the parents.
There is no fixed age limit set by law, but case law has introduced the concept of reasonableness. The obligation tends to fade when the child reaches an age where, according to the normal evolution of the job market and studies (generally around 30 years old, or at the end of the legal duration of the course of study plus a reasonable margin), they are expected to be self-sufficient. Maintenance is not due if the child is culpably inactive or delays their studies without just cause.
Precarious, occasional, or part-time work with meager income (like typical student jobs) does not automatically lead to economic self-sufficiency and therefore does not nullify the obligation of maintenance. However, a judge may consider this income to reduce the amount of the allowance payable by the parents, as the child partially contributes to their own support.
Managing maintenance for adult children, especially when life takes them away from home, requires careful assessment of specific circumstances and pre-existing agreements. If you need clarity on your obligations or wish to protect your rights when reviewing economic conditions, contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for an evaluation of your case. Studio Legale Bianucci awaits you in Milan, at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, to offer you competent and personalized legal support.