The accusation of a tax crime represents a moment of profound concern, not only for the entrepreneur but also for the professionals assisting them. The issue of omitted VAT and withholding tax payments raises complex questions, particularly when the investigation extends to involve the tax advisor or accountant. As a criminal lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci fully understands the disorientation a professional can experience when accused of complicity in a crime actually committed by their client.
The Italian legal system severely punishes the failure to pay certified withholdings and Value Added Tax, provided that specific thresholds of punishability are exceeded. The crime is consummated when the taxpayer fails to make the payment within the deadlines for filing the annual tax return. However, the matter becomes particularly delicate when the Public Prosecutor's Office hypothesizes direct involvement of the tax advisor.
For a professional to be held liable for complicity in omitted VAT or withholding tax payments, mere bookkeeping or electronic transmission of declarations is not sufficient. Jurisprudence requires proof of a causal contribution, whether material or moral, to the commission of the offense. In other words, the prosecution must demonstrate that the advisor incited the client not to pay, or actively suggested schemes or artifices to evade payment, acting with the awareness and intent to facilitate tax non-compliance.
Facing an accusation of complicity in tax crimes requires a meticulous defense strategy and a deep understanding of professional dynamics. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert criminal lawyer in Milan, focuses on a rigorous analysis of the actual scope of the professional mandate carried out by the advisor. The primary objective is to demonstrate the professional's complete detachment from the management and financial decisions of the client company.
The defense is structured through the in-depth study of the documentation exchanged between the professional and the client, to highlight how the advisor merely calculated the taxes due and promptly communicated them to the entrepreneur. From the perspective of a criminal lawyer, it is essential to dismantle the hypothesis of intent, proving that the professional never suggested the omission of payments as a business strategy, but rather correctly fulfilled their informational duties, leaving the final decision, and the related responsibility, solely to the company's administrator.
The criminal relevance of omitted payment is not automatic but depends on exceeding specific thresholds set by law. Currently, the crime of omitted payment of due or certified withholdings occurs if the amount not paid exceeds one hundred and fifty thousand euros for each tax period. For omitted VAT payments, the punishability threshold is set at two hundred and fifty thousand euros per tax period. Below these amounts, the violation remains an administrative offense, sanctioned by the Revenue Agency but without criminal consequences.
The company's liquidity crisis does not automatically transfer criminal liability to the tax advisor. If the entrepreneur decides not to pay taxes to pay, for example, employee salaries or strategic suppliers, they are making an autonomous business decision. An advisor who has regularly calculated the taxes and informed the client of the deadlines cannot be held complicit in this decision, unless proof emerges of their active and fraudulent suggestion in this regard.
To demonstrate the advisor's detachment, it is essential to documentarily reconstruct the flow of communications with the client. Emails, informational circulars, transmission letters for F24 forms, and minutes of meetings are crucial elements. This evidence serves to certify that the professional has carried out their mandate with diligence, informing the taxpayer of the amounts due and the legal consequences in case of non-payment, thus demonstrating the absence of any intent to participate in the crime.
Being involved in a tax crime investigation as a professional requires prompt and highly qualified defensive intervention to protect not only one's freedom but also professional reputation. Avv. Marco Bianucci analyzes each individual case with the utmost attention and confidentiality, building a tailored strategy to demonstrate the correctness of the advisor's actions. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci at the Bianucci Law Firm in Milan to schedule an initial consultation and jointly evaluate the most appropriate legal path for your situation.