With the decision filed on April 4, 2025, the Third Criminal Section of the Supreme Court of Cassation addressed a topic of daily relevance: the theft of money from self-service fuel dispensers. Ruling no. 13132/2025 is an important piece in understanding when theft becomes aggravated because it is committed on "things intended for public utility" and, consequently, is subject to ex officio prosecution according to the new art. 624-bis of the Italian Criminal Code, reformed by Legislative Decree 150/2022.
The defendant T. N. was accused of forcing open the self-service pump at a fuel distribution station, stealing the cash kept inside. The Court of Appeal of Palermo had classified the act as aggravated theft under art. 625, paragraph 1, no. 7 of the Italian Criminal Code, considering the money functionally linked to a public utility service. The defense argued for a reclassification to simple theft, asserting that only the machinery – not the cash – was intended for public service.
In matters of theft, the aggravating circumstance of the act committed on things intended for public utility, which renders the crime prosecutable ex officio under the regime following Legislative Decree no. 150 of October 10, 2022, is applicable in the case of the theft of money constituting the takings of a fuel dispenser contained within the "self-service" payment device, as the increased gravity of the offense exists not only when the thing specifically intended for public utility is stolen, but also when the object of the theft consists of a thing inherent to it.
The Court reiterates that criminal protection extends not only to the asset directly used for the service (the pump) but also to what is "inherent" and indispensable for its operation, i.e., the money intended to allow 24/7 refueling without an operator.
Fuel station managers, security companies, and insurance companies must consider that:
Ruling no. 13132/2025 offers essential clarification: in the era of automated payments, even the money kept inside the machines falls under "things intended for public utility." This results in a stricter regime and a prompt criminal response, aimed at protecting the efficiency of services that are now indispensable for citizens and hauliers. Sector operators are called upon to enhance security measures, while legal professionals can invoke this ruling as an authoritative precedent for correctly classifying similar offenses.