The recent order of the Court of Cassation, no. 37833 of 2022, offers an important opportunity for reflection on the delicate issues of international child abduction and the protection of human rights. The ruling concerns the case of A.A., mother of two minors, who were ordered to be repatriated to Ecuador, despite her reports of domestic violence. This complex situation highlights the rights to be protected and the rules to be applied, referencing both the Hague Convention of 1980 and the Istanbul Convention.
The Court examined A.A.'s appeal against the decree of the Juvenile Court of Catanzaro which had ordered the return of the minors to Ecuador, emphasizing the unlawfulness of the transfer by the mother. The Court deemed the mother's concerns about alleged risks to the minors' safety upon return unfounded, without adequately considering the domestic violence incidents she reported.
The judge must consider any domestic violence in the context of international child abduction.
The core of the issue lies in the need to protect the best interests of the child, as established by the Hague Convention. However, the Court highlighted that the Court did not sufficiently investigate the reports of domestic violence and the possible psychological consequences on the minors. Article 13 of the Hague Convention provides that the return of the child may be refused if there is a well-founded risk of physical or psychological danger. The Court's decision did not take these aspects into account, leading the Court to deem a new assessment necessary.
The Court upheld A.A.'s appeal, quashing the contested decree and remanding the case to the Juvenile Court of Catanzaro for a full review. This ruling represents a victory not only for A.A. but also for all victims of domestic violence. It is crucial that the competent authorities carefully consider the aspects of violence in custody disputes, in order to avoid further harm to the minors involved. The adequate protection of the rights of minors and victims of violence must be a priority, ensuring that judicial decisions are always oriented towards their well-being and safety.