Experiencing mobbing in the workplace is a grueling ordeal that affects not only professional serenity but also psychophysical balance and private life. Often, the victim feels isolated, powerless, and confused by hostile behaviors that seem endless. As an attorney specializing in damages compensation and labor law in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci deeply understands the delicacy of these dynamics and the importance of timely intervention to protect the worker's dignity and health.
In the Italian legal landscape, protection against mobbing finds its primary foundation in Article 2087 of the Civil Code, which obliges employers to protect the physical integrity and moral personality of their employees. However, not every workplace conflict or stressful situation constitutes mobbing. Case law has clarified that, to establish such a situation, a series of persecutory, systematic, and prolonged behaviors, carried out with a specific intent to harass, must be present. These acts can range from professional dequalification to physical marginalization, up to actual verbal aggression, and must result in harm to the employee's health or personality.
Addressing a mobbing case requires a meticulous strategy and a profound knowledge of the subject matter. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an attorney experienced in managing labor disputes in Milan, focuses on a rigorous analysis of the facts to build a solid evidentiary framework. The main difficulty in these cases often lies in the burden of proof; for this reason, the firm assists the client in identifying and collecting all useful elements, such as emails, service orders, testimonies, and medical certificates attesting to the biological or existential damage suffered. The primary objective is to obtain fair damages compensation and, where possible, the restoration of correct working conditions, always carefully evaluating both the path of out-of-court negotiation and litigation in court.
Proof of mobbing is complex and requires documenting the systematic nature of the harassment. Documentary evidence such as emails, unjustified warning letters, detrimental changes in duties or shifts, and medical certificates attesting to the onset of pathologies related to work stress are fundamental. Testimonies from colleagues can also be decisive, although often difficult to obtain due to fear of retaliation.
In cases of proven mobbing, the worker is entitled to compensation for various types of damages. This primarily includes material damages, related to medical expenses incurred or loss of career opportunities, and non-material damages. The latter includes biological damage, i.e., harm to psychophysical integrity certified by a forensic doctor, moral damage for the inner suffering endured, and existential damage for the alteration of life habits.
Straining is a milder form of mobbing. It occurs when an employee experiences a situation of forced stress in the workplace, caused by at least one significant hostile action, which has lasting negative effects over time. Unlike mobbing, straining lacks the requirement of continuity and frequency of harassing actions, but the damage suffered by the worker is still compensable.
The statute of limitations for claiming damages for mobbing is generally ten years if the liability is contractual (based on art. 2087 of the Civil Code), while it is five years if proceeding for non-contractual liability. However, it is crucial to act as soon as possible to avoid the loss of evidence and the worsening of health consequences.
If you believe you are a victim of injustice in the workplace and your health is suffering, it is essential to act with awareness. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for an evaluation of your case at the Milan office. During the consultation, the details of your situation will be examined to define the most effective strategy to protect your rights and your well-being.